Behavioral Biases and Information Quality in Real Estate Investment Decision-Making: Implications for Emerging Markets

Real estate investors decide under uncertainty, with heterogeneous assets and uneven access to comparable prices and property information. This paper synthesises research on anchoring, herding and loss aversion alongside information quality and asymmetry, focusing on emerging markets and Egypt. Existing evidence already includes a test of information asymmetry as a moderator of cognitive-bias effects, with risk perception as mediator, as well as transaction and disclosure studies linking information differences to prices and participation. The themes have therefore been examined jointly in part. The narrower gap is the fragmented measurement across self-reported behavioral models, transaction studies and transparency research: few studies directly test whether verifiable disclosure attributes condition anchoring or social influence and improve valuation calibration in emerging markets. Egyptian evidence is preliminary and does not test this interaction. The paper proposes a framework and research design that distinguish established findings from propositions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23751179
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Behavioral Biases and Information Quality in Real Estate Investment Decision-Making: Implications for Emerging Markets

Loay Ahmed Ibrahim Mostafa
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
preprint

Behavioral Biases and Information Quality in Real Estate Investment Decision-Making: Implications for Emerging Markets

Loay Ahmed Ibrahim Mostafa
preprint en

Abstract

Real estate investors decide under uncertainty, with heterogeneous assets and uneven access to comparable prices and property information. This paper synthesises research on anchoring, herding and loss aversion alongside information quality and asymmetry, focusing on emerging markets and Egypt. Existing evidence already includes a test of information asymmetry as a moderator of cognitive-bias effects, with risk perception as mediator, as well as transaction and disclosure studies linking information differences to prices and participation. The themes have therefore been examined jointly in part. The narrower gap is the fragmented measurement across self-reported behavioral models, transaction studies and transparency research: few studies directly test whether verifiable disclosure attributes condition anchoring or social influence and improve valuation calibration in emerging markets. Egyptian evidence is preliminary and does not test this interaction. The paper proposes a framework and research design that distinguish established findings from propositions.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon