Hallucination-Aware Clinical Decision Systems: Detecting and Mitigating AI False Outputs in Real-Time Diagnosis

This paper presents a framework for building hallucination-aware Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) that detect and reduce false or unverified AI outputs during real-time diagnosis. It combines three layers of defence. Retrieval-Augmented Generation grounds model outputs in medical guidelines, drug databases and patient Electronic Health Records. Uncertainty Quantification, using Bayesian Neural Networks, MC Dropout and Deep Ensembles, signals when the model is unsure. Granular fact-checking splits each output into atomic claims and verifies them against the patient record. The paper also discusses evaluation benchmarks (Med-HALT, FactScore, Med-NLI), human-in-the-loop review, trust calibration and guided deferral to clinicians. It concludes with future directions in regulation, agentic verification and longitudinal evaluation. Keywords: clinical decision support, AI hallucination, retrieval-augmented generation, uncertainty quantification, fact-checking, human-in-the-loop, patient safety

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23775207
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Hallucination-Aware Clinical Decision Systems: Detecting and Mitigating AI False Outputs in Real-Time Diagnosis

Mirza Sheezan Baig
1 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
preprint

Hallucination-Aware Clinical Decision Systems: Detecting and Mitigating AI False Outputs in Real-Time Diagnosis

Mirza Sheezan Baig
preprint en

Abstract

This paper presents a framework for building hallucination-aware Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) that detect and reduce false or unverified AI outputs during real-time diagnosis. It combines three layers of defence. Retrieval-Augmented Generation grounds model outputs in medical guidelines, drug databases and patient Electronic Health Records. Uncertainty Quantification, using Bayesian Neural Networks, MC Dropout and Deep Ensembles, signals when the model is unsure. Granular fact-checking splits each output into atomic claims and verifies them against the patient record. The paper also discusses evaluation benchmarks (Med-HALT, FactScore, Med-NLI), human-in-the-loop review, trust calibration and guided deferral to clinicians. It concludes with future directions in regulation, agentic verification and longitudinal evaluation. Keywords: clinical decision support, AI hallucination, retrieval-augmented generation, uncertainty quantification, fact-checking, human-in-the-loop, patient safety

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Good health and well-being
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Hallucination-Aware Clinical Decision Systems: Detecting and Mitigating AI False Outputs in Real-Time Diagnosis — Mirza Sheezan Baig · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS