Level 4 autonomous ship situational awareness system architecture and sensor trust management protocol

The relevance of this study is determined by the fact that, for Level 4 autonomous ships, traditional situational awareness architectures do not comply with Rule 5 of the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea concerning continuous lookout by all available means, since such ships do not distinguish between random noise, sensor degradation, and cyberattacks. This paper proposes a Level 1 situational awareness architecture consistent with the Endsley model. Sensors are divided into a continuously active core (radar, satellite navigation systems, Automatic Identification System, optical and thermal imaging cameras, microphones, and other systems) and specialized modules (LiDAR, Doppler speed log, sonar). A Sensor Trust Manager with a quality metric and a trust management protocol for navigational information sensors have been developed, combining noise level, deviation from the predicted value, cyberattack (spoofing) detection, and packet loss. The Trust Manager operates a six-state automaton (NOMINAL, DEGRADED, SUSPECT, ISOLATED, RECOVERING, FAILED) with transition hysteresis, ensuring resistance to short-term interference without false sensor isolation. Trust Managers ensure the isolation of unreliable sources before data enter the fusion filters. Thus, only physically reliable and time-consistent data are supplied to complex fusion algorithms (Kalman filters, trackers), which is critical for preventing “contamination” of the target vessel state assessment. The proposed architecture combines compliance with Rule 5, scenario adaptation through the division of sensors into basic and specialized groups, and cyber resilience (spoofing) through signal evaluation based on quality criteria, creating a theoretical basis for certification of Level 4 autonomous marine surface ships in accordance with the requirements of the Code of Safety for Autonomous Surface Ships .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vestnik Gosudarstvennogo universiteta morskogo i rechnogo flota imeni admirala S O Makarova
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21821/2309-5180-2026-18-5-822-833
Primary Topic
Maritime Navigation and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Level 4 autonomous ship situational awareness system architecture and sensor trust management protocol

В.И. Филатов, S.I. Kondratiev, В.В. Астреин
Vestnik Gosudarstvennogo universiteta morskogo i rechnogo flota imeni admirala S O Makarova
Maritime Navigation and Safety
article

Level 4 autonomous ship situational awareness system architecture and sensor trust management protocol

В.И. Филатов, S.I. Kondratiev, В.В. Астреин
article en

Abstract

The relevance of this study is determined by the fact that, for Level 4 autonomous ships, traditional situational awareness architectures do not comply with Rule 5 of the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea concerning continuous lookout by all available means, since such ships do not distinguish between random noise, sensor degradation, and cyberattacks. This paper proposes a Level 1 situational awareness architecture consistent with the Endsley model. Sensors are divided into a continuously active core (radar, satellite navigation systems, Automatic Identification System, optical and thermal imaging cameras, microphones, and other systems) and specialized modules (LiDAR, Doppler speed log, sonar). A Sensor Trust Manager with a quality metric and a trust management protocol for navigational information sensors have been developed, combining noise level, deviation from the predicted value, cyberattack (spoofing) detection, and packet loss. The Trust Manager operates a six-state automaton (NOMINAL, DEGRADED, SUSPECT, ISOLATED, RECOVERING, FAILED) with transition hysteresis, ensuring resistance to short-term interference without false sensor isolation. Trust Managers ensure the isolation of unreliable sources before data enter the fusion filters. Thus, only physically reliable and time-consistent data are supplied to complex fusion algorithms (Kalman filters, trackers), which is critical for preventing “contamination” of the target vessel state assessment. The proposed architecture combines compliance with Rule 5, scenario adaptation through the division of sensors into basic and specialized groups, and cyber resilience (spoofing) through signal evaluation based on quality criteria, creating a theoretical basis for certification of Level 4 autonomous marine surface ships in accordance with the requirements of the Code of Safety for Autonomous Surface Ships .

Vestnik Gosudarstvennogo universiteta morskogo i rechnogo flota imeni admirala S O MakarovaVol. 18(5)
Admiral Ushakov State Maritime University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Maritime Navigation and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Level 4 autonomous ship situational awareness system architecture and sensor trust management protocol — В.И. Филатов, S.I. Kondratiev, et al. · Vestnik Gosudarstvennogo universiteta morskogo i rechnogo flota imeni admirala S O Makarova (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS