Core schema instability in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis: within-person variability as an index of self-belief precision

Aim. Core schemas are considered stable traits in clinical high risk (CHR) research. However, unexamined fluctuation may conceal belief changes that precede psychosis emergence. We examined whether schemas possess considerable within-person variability in CHR, and whether that variability exceeds that of controls. Methods. In NAPLS 2, 411 CHR and 194 control participants completed the Brief Core Schema Scales (BCSS) at least three times across 24 months. Random-intercept models identified intraclass correlations in CHR. Bayesian censored location-scale models, correcting for floor scores and mean level differences, compared within-person SD between groups. Results. Within-person variance accounted for 41.3% to 50.6% of BCSS variance in CHR. Latent within-person SD was greater in CHR on all four subscales, most for negative-self (ratio 1.71, 95% CrI [1.50, 1.94]). This variability was largely independent of shared improvement and psychotropic medication effects. Conclusions. Core schemas fluctuate substantially in CHR compared to controls, particularly in negative self-beliefs. Single baseline scores may understate associations between schemas and outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
medRxiv
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.27.26366553
Primary Topic
Schizophrenia research and treatment
Type
preprint

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Core schema instability in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis: within-person variability as an index of self-belief precision

Emily A. Farina, Diana O. Perkins, Albert R. Powers, Catalina Mourgues et al.
1 links
medRxiv
Schizophrenia research and treatment
preprint

Core schema instability in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis: within-person variability as an index of self-belief precision

Emily A. Farina, Diana O. Perkins, Albert R. Powers, Catalina Mourgues, Carrie E. Bearden, Daniel H. Mathalon, Elaine F. Walker, Thomas H. McGlashan, Jean Addington, Hesham Mukhtar, Scott W. Woods, Kristin S. Cadenhead, Abhishek Saxena, Tyrone D. Cannon, Alexander Broekhuijse
preprint en

Abstract

Aim. Core schemas are considered stable traits in clinical high risk (CHR) research. However, unexamined fluctuation may conceal belief changes that precede psychosis emergence. We examined whether schemas possess considerable within-person variability in CHR, and whether that variability exceeds that of controls. Methods. In NAPLS 2, 411 CHR and 194 control participants completed the Brief Core Schema Scales (BCSS) at least three times across 24 months. Random-intercept models identified intraclass correlations in CHR. Bayesian censored location-scale models, correcting for floor scores and mean level differences, compared within-person SD between groups. Results. Within-person variance accounted for 41.3% to 50.6% of BCSS variance in CHR. Latent within-person SD was greater in CHR on all four subscales, most for negative-self (ratio 1.71, 95% CrI [1.50, 1.94]). This variability was largely independent of shared improvement and psychotropic medication effects. Conclusions. Core schemas fluctuate substantially in CHR compared to controls, particularly in negative self-beliefs. Single baseline scores may understate associations between schemas and outcomes.

medRxiv
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), San Francisco VA Medical Center (US), Emory University (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Calgary (CA), University of California, San Francisco (US), Yale University (US), University of California San Diego (US), Connecticut Mental Health Center (US), Hotchkiss Brain Institute (CA)
National Institute of Mental Health
Good health and well-being
Schizophrenia research and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon