Strategic Alignment, Sustainable Competitive Advantage, Strategic Leadership and Firm Performance among Commercial Banks in Kenya

This study examined the serial mediating effect of sustainable competitive advantage and strategic alignment on the relationship between strategic leadership and firm performance among commercial banks in Kenya. An explanatory cross-sectional survey design was adopted, and primary data were collected through structured questionnaires from 304 managers. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, multiple linear regression and Hayes’ PROCESS Macro Model 6 with 5,000 bootstrap samples were used. All six direct null hypotheses were rejected. Strategic leadership positively affected firm performance (B = .626, β = .322, t = 6.430, p < .001, R² = .298), strategic alignment (B = .387, β = .275, t = 5.484, p < .001, R² = .293), and sustainable competitive advantage (B = .481, β = .249, t = 5.523, p < .001, R² = .431). Strategic alignment positively affected firm performance (B = .800, β = .577, t = 11.999, p < .001, R² = .460) and sustainable competitive advantage (B = .880, β = .638, t = 17.523, p < .001, R² = .690). Sustainable competitive advantage had the strongest direct effect on firm performance (B = .693, β = .690, t = 13.360, p < .001, R² = .499). In the serial mediation model, the direct effect of strategic leadership on firm performance remained significant (B = .2801, p = .0009); the total indirect effect was .3458, Boot 95% CI [.2167, .5081]. The indirect effect through sustainable competitive advantage alone was significant (.2121, Boot 95% CI [.1198, .3471]); the indirect effect through strategic alignment alone was not (.0418, Boot 95% CI [-.0048, .0999]); and the serial indirect effect through sustainable competitive advantage and strategic alignment was significant (.0918, Boot 95% CI [.0394, .1617]). The study concludes that strategic leadership improves bank performance both directly and by building durable competitive capabilities that become more valuable when aligned with organizational structures, systems, technology and processes. Keywords: strategic leadership, strategic alignment, sustainable competitive advantage, firm performance, commercial banks, Kenya, serial mediation

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Strategic Management
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t70125
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategic Alignment, Sustainable Competitive Advantage, Strategic Leadership and Firm Performance among Commercial Banks in Kenya

Ronald Bonuke, Joel Chepkwony, Michael Mumassabba Wamache
Journal of Strategic Management
Management and Organizational Practices
article

Strategic Alignment, Sustainable Competitive Advantage, Strategic Leadership and Firm Performance among Commercial Banks in Kenya

Ronald Bonuke, Joel Chepkwony, Michael Mumassabba Wamache
article en

Abstract

This study examined the serial mediating effect of sustainable competitive advantage and strategic alignment on the relationship between strategic leadership and firm performance among commercial banks in Kenya. An explanatory cross-sectional survey design was adopted, and primary data were collected through structured questionnaires from 304 managers. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, multiple linear regression and Hayes’ PROCESS Macro Model 6 with 5,000 bootstrap samples were used. All six direct null hypotheses were rejected. Strategic leadership positively affected firm performance (B = .626, β = .322, t = 6.430, p < .001, R² = .298), strategic alignment (B = .387, β = .275, t = 5.484, p < .001, R² = .293), and sustainable competitive advantage (B = .481, β = .249, t = 5.523, p < .001, R² = .431). Strategic alignment positively affected firm performance (B = .800, β = .577, t = 11.999, p < .001, R² = .460) and sustainable competitive advantage (B = .880, β = .638, t = 17.523, p < .001, R² = .690). Sustainable competitive advantage had the strongest direct effect on firm performance (B = .693, β = .690, t = 13.360, p < .001, R² = .499). In the serial mediation model, the direct effect of strategic leadership on firm performance remained significant (B = .2801, p = .0009); the total indirect effect was .3458, Boot 95% CI [.2167, .5081]. The indirect effect through sustainable competitive advantage alone was significant (.2121, Boot 95% CI [.1198, .3471]); the indirect effect through strategic alignment alone was not (.0418, Boot 95% CI [-.0048, .0999]); and the serial indirect effect through sustainable competitive advantage and strategic alignment was significant (.0918, Boot 95% CI [.0394, .1617]). The study concludes that strategic leadership improves bank performance both directly and by building durable competitive capabilities that become more valuable when aligned with organizational structures, systems, technology and processes. Keywords: strategic leadership, strategic alignment, sustainable competitive advantage, firm performance, commercial banks, Kenya, serial mediation

Journal of Strategic ManagementVol. 10(7)
Moi University (KE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Management and Organizational Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon