Embedding research within advanced radiotherapy practice: A qualitative multi-centre study of UK radiotherapy departments with international implications

INTRODUCTION: Research is recognised as one of the four pillars of advanced practice, yet its integration within radiotherapy roles remains uneven. This study explored how research was embedded within Advanced Practice Research Radiographer (APRR) roles across UK radiotherapy services and identified organisational conditions associated with more formalised implementation. METHODS: An interpretivist qualitative multi-centre study was undertaken in five UK radiotherapy departments from January to December 2025. Purposive sampling recruited 28 participants from radiography, oncology, nursing and physics roles. Data were generated through non-participant observations, contemporaneous field notes and semi-structured interviews; interviews were documented in field notes rather than audio-recorded. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, supported by iterative team triangulation, and reported in line with Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guidance. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: strategic integration of research; governance and professional identity; protected research capacity; and clinical-academic integration. Research was most effectively embedded where organisations aligned role expectations with service strategy, provided clearer governance and role definitions, protected research time, and supported collaboration across clinical and academic settings. Conversely, variable titles, inconsistent job planning and limited backfill reduced role clarity, sustainability and influence. A key limitation is that interviews were not audio-recorded, and the analysis therefore relied on contemporaneous field notes. CONCLUSIONS: Embedding research within advanced radiotherapy practice depends on transferable organisational conditions: strategic leadership, governance, protected capacity and clinical-academic connectivity. Although derived solely from UK data, these findings may inform workforce and policy development in other settings; Singapore is one illustrative example of a system seeking to adapt such principles without contributing empirical data to this study. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Research helps healthcare professionals improve care, but it is not always easy to include in everyday clinical roles. This study examined how research was built into advanced radiographer roles in radiotherapy departments in the United Kingdom. This study found that research was more successful when staff had protected time, clear responsibilities, supportive leadership, and strong links with academic partners. This matters because these conditions may help healthcare teams produce and use research that improves patient care and professional practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2026.102615
Primary Topic
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Embedding research within advanced radiotherapy practice: A qualitative multi-centre study of UK radiotherapy departments with international implications

Ricardo Khine, Simon Goldsworthy, Robin Jhagra, Yuen Nee Yvonne Loh
Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
article

Embedding research within advanced radiotherapy practice: A qualitative multi-centre study of UK radiotherapy departments with international implications

Ricardo Khine, Simon Goldsworthy, Robin Jhagra, Yuen Nee Yvonne Loh
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Research is recognised as one of the four pillars of advanced practice, yet its integration within radiotherapy roles remains uneven. This study explored how research was embedded within Advanced Practice Research Radiographer (APRR) roles across UK radiotherapy services and identified organisational conditions associated with more formalised implementation. METHODS: An interpretivist qualitative multi-centre study was undertaken in five UK radiotherapy departments from January to December 2025. Purposive sampling recruited 28 participants from radiography, oncology, nursing and physics roles. Data were generated through non-participant observations, contemporaneous field notes and semi-structured interviews; interviews were documented in field notes rather than audio-recorded. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, supported by iterative team triangulation, and reported in line with Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guidance. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: strategic integration of research; governance and professional identity; protected research capacity; and clinical-academic integration. Research was most effectively embedded where organisations aligned role expectations with service strategy, provided clearer governance and role definitions, protected research time, and supported collaboration across clinical and academic settings. Conversely, variable titles, inconsistent job planning and limited backfill reduced role clarity, sustainability and influence. A key limitation is that interviews were not audio-recorded, and the analysis therefore relied on contemporaneous field notes. CONCLUSIONS: Embedding research within advanced radiotherapy practice depends on transferable organisational conditions: strategic leadership, governance, protected capacity and clinical-academic connectivity. Although derived solely from UK data, these findings may inform workforce and policy development in other settings; Singapore is one illustrative example of a system seeking to adapt such principles without contributing empirical data to this study. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Research helps healthcare professionals improve care, but it is not always easy to include in everyday clinical roles. This study examined how research was built into advanced radiographer roles in radiotherapy departments in the United Kingdom. This study found that research was more successful when staff had protected time, clear responsibilities, supportive leadership, and strong links with academic partners. This matters because these conditions may help healthcare teams produce and use research that improves patient care and professional practice.

Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciencesVol. 57(6)
Queen Mary University of London (GB), University of the West of England (GB), Health Sciences University (GB), Musgrove Park Hospital (GB), National University Cancer Institute, Singapore (SG), Taunton & Somerset NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Somerset NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Latvia (LV)
International Atomic Energy Agency
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon