Attendance without schooling: certification, family resources and public support for school non-attendance in Japan

Japan's public education support centres are counted as places of learning. This article argues that their distinctive product is a record. Japanese law requires guardians to have their children attend school, and education at home does not meet that duty. A day at a centre can therefore count as attendance in the pupil's file, while the ministry's own survey counts the same day as an absence. The record lets the state keep a duty it no longer enforces. Drawing on Weber and Etzrodt, the article separates two family capacities: reaching a centre and replacing what it offers. Three propositions follow. The public centre is the most reliable route to the record. Families who can replace the centre use it only for the record, and leave once the record stops mattering. As routes to the record multiply, centres are left to families who can reach them but cannot replace them.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/w7zqf_v1
Primary Topic
Diverse Education Studies and Reforms
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Attendance without schooling: certification, family resources and public support for school non-attendance in Japan

Shiyun Zhang Isabelle
Diverse Education Studies and Reforms
preprint

Attendance without schooling: certification, family resources and public support for school non-attendance in Japan

Shiyun Zhang Isabelle
preprint en

Abstract

Japan's public education support centres are counted as places of learning. This article argues that their distinctive product is a record. Japanese law requires guardians to have their children attend school, and education at home does not meet that duty. A day at a centre can therefore count as attendance in the pupil's file, while the ministry's own survey counts the same day as an absence. The record lets the state keep a duty it no longer enforces. Drawing on Weber and Etzrodt, the article separates two family capacities: reaching a centre and replacing what it offers. Three propositions follow. The public centre is the most reliable route to the record. Families who can replace the centre use it only for the record, and leave once the record stops mattering. As routes to the record multiply, centres are left to families who can reach them but cannot replace them.

Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Quality education
Diverse Education Studies and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon