Loneliness in the United States: State-Level Variation and the Limits of Broad Geographic Context

Loneliness is increasingly recognized as a major public health concern in the United States. Prior research has identified many individual-level correlates of loneliness. This study asks a narrower geographic question: whether selected state-level contextual indicators explain remaining differences in frequent loneliness after accounting for individual composition. Using 2024 Household Pulse Survey data, this study examines frequent loneliness across the fifty U.S. states. The analysis combines weighted state estimates with multilevel logistic regression. Results show clear descriptive differences across states. Higher rates appear in parts of the South, the Pacific Northwest, and the Appalachian region, whereas several coastal states and parts of the Midwest report lower levels. State-level differences become very small, however, after individual characteristics are included in the model. Marital status, financial strain, and indicators of social interaction are strongly associated with loneliness. In contrast, selected state-level indicators, including population density, commuting structure, political composition, temperature, and precipitation, add little explanatory power. These findings do not suggest that geography is unimportant. Rather, they highlight the limits of the state as a geographic scale and the need to test finer spatial units and more direct measures of local context.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.34862689
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Loneliness in the United States: State-Level Variation and the Limits of Broad Geographic Context

Mark W. Horner, Amber D. DeJohn, Weining Kan, Ziqi Li
1 links
Figshare
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Loneliness in the United States: State-Level Variation and the Limits of Broad Geographic Context

Mark W. Horner, Amber D. DeJohn, Weining Kan, Ziqi Li
article en

Abstract

Loneliness is increasingly recognized as a major public health concern in the United States. Prior research has identified many individual-level correlates of loneliness. This study asks a narrower geographic question: whether selected state-level contextual indicators explain remaining differences in frequent loneliness after accounting for individual composition. Using 2024 Household Pulse Survey data, this study examines frequent loneliness across the fifty U.S. states. The analysis combines weighted state estimates with multilevel logistic regression. Results show clear descriptive differences across states. Higher rates appear in parts of the South, the Pacific Northwest, and the Appalachian region, whereas several coastal states and parts of the Midwest report lower levels. State-level differences become very small, however, after individual characteristics are included in the model. Marital status, financial strain, and indicators of social interaction are strongly associated with loneliness. In contrast, selected state-level indicators, including population density, commuting structure, political composition, temperature, and precipitation, add little explanatory power. These findings do not suggest that geography is unimportant. Rather, they highlight the limits of the state as a geographic scale and the need to test finer spatial units and more direct measures of local context.

Figshare
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Loneliness in the United States: State-Level Variation and the Limits of Broad Geographic Context — Mark W. Horner, Amber D. DeJohn, et al. · Figshare (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS