“Envisioning Mortgage Futures”: A Comment on Burrows et al.’s Paper

In this brief article, I comment on Burrows, Wallace, Beer, Ciocănel and Cussens’ article ‘envisioning mortgage futures’. I consider the epistemic continuities between established and emerging credit scoring technologies, questioning the extent to which their opacity and consequences for inequality represent a departure from existing practices. I focus particularly on the implications of network-based credit assessment for family relationships, alongside the challenges of collective mobilisation and the role of regulation in shaping these developments. I ultimately call for critical social science to engage more directly with the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Housing Theory and Society
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2026.2748413
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Envisioning Mortgage Futures”: A Comment on Burrows et al.’s Paper

Julia Anne Cook
1 links
Housing Theory and Society
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
article

“Envisioning Mortgage Futures”: A Comment on Burrows et al.’s Paper

Julia Anne Cook
article en

Abstract

In this brief article, I comment on Burrows, Wallace, Beer, Ciocănel and Cussens’ article ‘envisioning mortgage futures’. I consider the epistemic continuities between established and emerging credit scoring technologies, questioning the extent to which their opacity and consequences for inequality represent a departure from existing practices. I focus particularly on the implications of network-based credit assessment for family relationships, alongside the challenges of collective mobilisation and the role of regulation in shaping these developments. I ultimately call for critical social science to engage more directly with the future.

Housing Theory and Society
University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon