Empirical Investigation of the Underlying Correlation between Space and Matter: A Pure Experimental System Based on Vacuum Medium Modulation Carrier Displacement, and Celestial Orbital Observations

To independently investigate the underlying physical correlations among spatial ontology, physical matter, and the material interaction network, this study adopts a purely experimental, observational, and empirical research approach. Without relying on any prior theoretical assumptions, this research systematically establishes the inherent operational laws of space and matter solely through controllable vacuum experiments, medium-filling controls, macroscopic carrier translations, and orbital celestial displacement observations. Through multiple sets of progressive and reproducible experiments, this study establishes a series of stable, reusable, and engineering-practical physical laws: Space is a universally unified, static, inherently existing foundational background; it is neither created subsequently nor generated by matter. The spatial background of Earth and cosmic space are completely identical in ontology, with environmental differences determined solely by local material filling states. Material systems can continuously undergo coordinate displacement within the static spatial background. Matter within the same moving cluster shares the same velocity, thereby maintaining a constant internal coupling topological distance. Interactions such as gravity, light, and magnetism can propagate in a high-vacuum environment relying on a globally distributed material network, rather than the traditional aether. Material clusters carry their own material interaction networks during synchronous displacement, and the gravitational interaction region migrates synchronously with the spatial coordinates of physical matter. All conclusions in this study are derived from objective experiments and celestial observation facts, intended solely to construct an independent and self-consistent space-matter coupling system, without participating in any theoretical opposition or academic controversy.