The dark and bright sides of being alone: Moderators and covariates of general loneliness

Background Solitude is often associated with loneliness and is therefore commonly viewed as a negative state, despite studies showing its potential benefits. Drawing on existential and self-determination theory perspectives, we propose a Prism Model in which attitudes toward solitude -- Solitude Intolerance and Solitude Appreciation -- measured using the Differential Test of Aloneness moderate the associations of General Loneliness with well-being and affect following solitude. Methods Two cross-sectional online studies in samples of U.S. adults (N = 408 and N = 266, of whom 169 reported solitude in the preceding 24 h and were included in the hypothesis tests) examined whether attitudes toward solitude moderated the associations of General Loneliness with well-being and affect, controlling for dispositional autonomy and autonomous and controlled motivation for solitude. Results In Study 1, Solitude Intolerance moderated the negative association between General Loneliness and well-being, whereas Solitude Appreciation did not. In Study 2, Solitude Intolerance moderated the associations of General Loneliness with well-being, high-arousal positive affect, and low-arousal positive affect, but not with negative affect. Solitude Appreciation moderated only the loneliness–well-being association. Significant interactions accounted for modest increments in explained variance. Conclusions Contrary to prediction, the negative association between General Loneliness and well-being was weaker at higher levels of Solitude Intolerance. This finding suggests underlying processes that may buffer people from the negative impact of loneliness, though a buffering effect must be explicitly tested using appropriate methodologies. Although not the focus, motivation for solitude accounted for variance in all outcomes. Future longitudinal and experimental research should examine the processes underlying these findings and explore the utility of positive solitude interventions targeting attitudes and motivation in helping to cope with loneliness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.103910
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The dark and bright sides of being alone: Moderators and covariates of general loneliness

Martin F. Lynch, Евгений Николаевич Осин, Dmitry A. Leontiev, Jungmin Lee
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Health disparities and outcomes
article

The dark and bright sides of being alone: Moderators and covariates of general loneliness

Martin F. Lynch, Евгений Николаевич Осин, Dmitry A. Leontiev, Jungmin Lee
article en

Abstract

Background Solitude is often associated with loneliness and is therefore commonly viewed as a negative state, despite studies showing its potential benefits. Drawing on existential and self-determination theory perspectives, we propose a Prism Model in which attitudes toward solitude -- Solitude Intolerance and Solitude Appreciation -- measured using the Differential Test of Aloneness moderate the associations of General Loneliness with well-being and affect following solitude. Methods Two cross-sectional online studies in samples of U.S. adults (N = 408 and N = 266, of whom 169 reported solitude in the preceding 24 h and were included in the hypothesis tests) examined whether attitudes toward solitude moderated the associations of General Loneliness with well-being and affect, controlling for dispositional autonomy and autonomous and controlled motivation for solitude. Results In Study 1, Solitude Intolerance moderated the negative association between General Loneliness and well-being, whereas Solitude Appreciation did not. In Study 2, Solitude Intolerance moderated the associations of General Loneliness with well-being, high-arousal positive affect, and low-arousal positive affect, but not with negative affect. Solitude Appreciation moderated only the loneliness–well-being association. Significant interactions accounted for modest increments in explained variance. Conclusions Contrary to prediction, the negative association between General Loneliness and well-being was weaker at higher levels of Solitude Intolerance. This finding suggests underlying processes that may buffer people from the negative impact of loneliness, though a buffering effect must be explicitly tested using appropriate methodologies. Although not the focus, motivation for solitude accounted for variance in all outcomes. Future longitudinal and experimental research should examine the processes underlying these findings and explore the utility of positive solitude interventions targeting attitudes and motivation in helping to cope with loneliness.

Social Sciences & Humanities OpenVol. 14
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU), Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training (KR), Université Paris Nanterre (FR), University of Rochester (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon