Fecal calprotectin testing for inflammatory bowel disease in patients presenting with lower gastrointestinal symptoms: a retrospective primary care cohort study in the United Kingdom

BACKGROUND: Fecal calprotectin (FC) can help to differentiate inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from other causes of lower gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. This study aimed to study FC testing in primary care, associated factors, subsequent secondary care referrals and IBD diagnoses. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using primary care data in England. Adults aged 18-60 with lower GI symptoms between 2015 and 2023 were included. FC testing 30 days before to 3 months after a recorded lower GI symptom was examined. A random-effects logistic regression model explored patient-level factors associated with FC testing. Referral pathways and diagnostic outcomes among patients with FC testing were examined. RESULTS: Of 830 936 symptomatic patients, 34 944 (4.2%) had FC testing. FC testing increased from 1.6% of symptomatic patients in 2015 to 7.7% in 2023 (P = .001). Factors negatively associated with FC testing included female sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.78-0.82), lower socioeconomic status (aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.86-0.95), smoking (aOR, 0.86; 95% CI,, 0.83-0.89) and obesity (aOR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.89-0.95). Among patients referred to gastroenterology, 23.7% with FC >250µg/g were diagnosed with IBD, but only 4.1% with FC 100-250µg/g. Among patients with rectal bleeding and FC 100-250µg/g, 9% had IBD. Despite normal FC results (<100µg/g), 25.2% of symptomatic patients were still referred to secondary care, of whom 0.5% were diagnosed with IBD and 1% with colorectal cancer. CONCLUSION: FC can effectively triage primary care patients with suspected IBD. Despite negative FC results, a significant proportion of patients were still referred to secondary care, with very few diagnosed with IBD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izag218
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fecal calprotectin testing for inflammatory bowel disease in patients presenting with lower gastrointestinal symptoms: a retrospective primary care cohort study in the United Kingdom

Shamil MM Haroon, Philip Harvey, Steven Wambua, Nigel John Trudgill et al.
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

Fecal calprotectin testing for inflammatory bowel disease in patients presenting with lower gastrointestinal symptoms: a retrospective primary care cohort study in the United Kingdom

Shamil MM Haroon, Philip Harvey, Steven Wambua, Nigel John Trudgill, Nicola Jaime Adderley, Nosheen Umar
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fecal calprotectin (FC) can help to differentiate inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from other causes of lower gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. This study aimed to study FC testing in primary care, associated factors, subsequent secondary care referrals and IBD diagnoses. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using primary care data in England. Adults aged 18-60 with lower GI symptoms between 2015 and 2023 were included. FC testing 30 days before to 3 months after a recorded lower GI symptom was examined. A random-effects logistic regression model explored patient-level factors associated with FC testing. Referral pathways and diagnostic outcomes among patients with FC testing were examined. RESULTS: Of 830 936 symptomatic patients, 34 944 (4.2%) had FC testing. FC testing increased from 1.6% of symptomatic patients in 2015 to 7.7% in 2023 (P = .001). Factors negatively associated with FC testing included female sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.78-0.82), lower socioeconomic status (aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.86-0.95), smoking (aOR, 0.86; 95% CI,, 0.83-0.89) and obesity (aOR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.89-0.95). Among patients referred to gastroenterology, 23.7% with FC >250µg/g were diagnosed with IBD, but only 4.1% with FC 100-250µg/g. Among patients with rectal bleeding and FC 100-250µg/g, 9% had IBD. Despite normal FC results (<100µg/g), 25.2% of symptomatic patients were still referred to secondary care, of whom 0.5% were diagnosed with IBD and 1% with colorectal cancer. CONCLUSION: FC can effectively triage primary care patients with suspected IBD. Despite negative FC results, a significant proportion of patients were still referred to secondary care, with very few diagnosed with IBD.

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB), The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust (GB), NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon