Prevention and treatment of post‐endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography cholangitis: Current evidence and future directions

Abstract Background Cholangitis represents a common infectious sequela of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), occurring in 0.5%–3% of procedures, and may deteriorate into severe cholangitis and sepsis. Methods This narrative review synthesises contemporary evidence on the prevention and management of post‐ERCP cholangitis. The literature search followed applicable Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 items for narrative reviews. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Data were searched from January 2015 to May 2026. Results The principal mechanisms involve retrograde bacterial contamination and compromised bile drainage. Preventive measures should be individualised according to preoperative cholangitis status: in patients with pre‐existing cholangitis, therapeutic antibiotics plus urgent drainage are critical; in those without, postoperative prevention is key. Prevention encompasses strict ERCP indications, early risk assessment, selective prophylactic antibiotics, meticulous intraoperative technique, and postoperative monitoring. Treatment requires prompt empirical antibiotics covering Gram‐negative bacilli and anaerobes, followed by susceptibility‐guided adjustment, together with early biliary drainage. Endoscopic drainage is preferred; percutaneous transhepatic and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)‐guided drainage are second‐line options, and surgery is reserved as a last resort. Key recommendations were graded using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Prophylactic antibiotic biliary lavage and novel biliary stents remain controversial. Conclusion Improved outcomes depend on early risk assessment, adequate biliary drainage, and prudent antimicrobial use. Strategies should be individualised by preoperative cholangitis status. Large‐scale, multicentre randomised controlled trials are needed to refine personalised management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Translational Discovery
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ctd2.70229
Primary Topic
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevention and treatment of post‐endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography cholangitis: Current evidence and future directions

Jun Yao, Hao‐Xin Chen
1 links
Clinical and Translational Discovery
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
article

Prevention and treatment of post‐endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography cholangitis: Current evidence and future directions

Jun Yao, Hao‐Xin Chen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Cholangitis represents a common infectious sequela of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), occurring in 0.5%–3% of procedures, and may deteriorate into severe cholangitis and sepsis. Methods This narrative review synthesises contemporary evidence on the prevention and management of post‐ERCP cholangitis. The literature search followed applicable Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 items for narrative reviews. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Data were searched from January 2015 to May 2026. Results The principal mechanisms involve retrograde bacterial contamination and compromised bile drainage. Preventive measures should be individualised according to preoperative cholangitis status: in patients with pre‐existing cholangitis, therapeutic antibiotics plus urgent drainage are critical; in those without, postoperative prevention is key. Prevention encompasses strict ERCP indications, early risk assessment, selective prophylactic antibiotics, meticulous intraoperative technique, and postoperative monitoring. Treatment requires prompt empirical antibiotics covering Gram‐negative bacilli and anaerobes, followed by susceptibility‐guided adjustment, together with early biliary drainage. Endoscopic drainage is preferred; percutaneous transhepatic and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)‐guided drainage are second‐line options, and surgery is reserved as a last resort. Key recommendations were graded using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Prophylactic antibiotic biliary lavage and novel biliary stents remain controversial. Conclusion Improved outcomes depend on early risk assessment, adequate biliary drainage, and prudent antimicrobial use. Strategies should be individualised by preoperative cholangitis status. Large‐scale, multicentre randomised controlled trials are needed to refine personalised management.

Clinical and Translational DiscoveryVol. 6(6)
Jinan University (CN), ShenZhen People’s Hospital (CN)
Science, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon