A checklist for developing faculty generated self-learning guides

There is a growing prevalence of flipped classroom environments in undergraduate medical education. In these settings, faculty-generated self-learning guides (SLGs), a form of prework, are commonly used to support student-directed learning. However, faculty-generated content may lack standardization in design and alignment with student learning needs which can hinder student engagement and learning efficiency. This article presents practical, student informed recommendations for developing effective SLGs based on established educational theory. We conducted a mixed-methods study of second-year medical students who engaged with self-learning guides during their first year. Seventy-two of 158 eligible students completed a content-validated survey assessing preferences for guide format and engagement patterns. Eleven of these students participated in focus group discussions to explore organizational and content elements that support or hinder learning. Using an inductive thematic analysis approach, we identified key themes and translated them into a checklist for faculty use, which we distill here into actionable items. Students strongly valued consistency in guide structure across faculty and courses (mean Likert scores 4.77 and 4.74 out of 5, respectively). Key themes included the importance of clinically relevant and board aligned content, clear learning objectives matched to content organization, concise introductions, strategic visual formatting such as bolding and underlining of key terms (mean 4.67), integration of tables and graphics (mean 4.49), content chunking for digestibility, reasonable video duration (preferred 20 min or less), and removal of superfluous information. Poorly structured guides with excessive length, unclear objectives, and lack of visual organization were perceived as hindering learning efficiency and engagement. Student feedback, analyzed through the lens of Cognitive Load Theory, Multimedia Learning Theory, and Self-Directed Learning principles, informed a practical checklist for faculty to use before, during, and after guide creation. By aligning guide design with learner preferences and evidence based educational principles, faculty can enhance content quality, improve student engagement, and increase the effectiveness of independent learning resources in flipped classroom settings. Future research should validate this checklist across multiple institutions and assess its impact on objective learning outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10347-y
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A checklist for developing faculty generated self-learning guides

Gwynneth D. Offner, Caitlin M. Neri, Jonathan J. Wisco, Molly B. Cohen-Osher et al.
BMC Medical Education
Innovations in Medical Education
article

A checklist for developing faculty generated self-learning guides

Gwynneth D. Offner, Caitlin M. Neri, Jonathan J. Wisco, Molly B. Cohen-Osher, Luke Scheuer, Roey Ringel, Priya S. Garg, Cameron Hill, Thomas McNamara
article en

Abstract

There is a growing prevalence of flipped classroom environments in undergraduate medical education. In these settings, faculty-generated self-learning guides (SLGs), a form of prework, are commonly used to support student-directed learning. However, faculty-generated content may lack standardization in design and alignment with student learning needs which can hinder student engagement and learning efficiency. This article presents practical, student informed recommendations for developing effective SLGs based on established educational theory. We conducted a mixed-methods study of second-year medical students who engaged with self-learning guides during their first year. Seventy-two of 158 eligible students completed a content-validated survey assessing preferences for guide format and engagement patterns. Eleven of these students participated in focus group discussions to explore organizational and content elements that support or hinder learning. Using an inductive thematic analysis approach, we identified key themes and translated them into a checklist for faculty use, which we distill here into actionable items. Students strongly valued consistency in guide structure across faculty and courses (mean Likert scores 4.77 and 4.74 out of 5, respectively). Key themes included the importance of clinically relevant and board aligned content, clear learning objectives matched to content organization, concise introductions, strategic visual formatting such as bolding and underlining of key terms (mean 4.67), integration of tables and graphics (mean 4.49), content chunking for digestibility, reasonable video duration (preferred 20 min or less), and removal of superfluous information. Poorly structured guides with excessive length, unclear objectives, and lack of visual organization were perceived as hindering learning efficiency and engagement. Student feedback, analyzed through the lens of Cognitive Load Theory, Multimedia Learning Theory, and Self-Directed Learning principles, informed a practical checklist for faculty to use before, during, and after guide creation. By aligning guide design with learner preferences and evidence based educational principles, faculty can enhance content quality, improve student engagement, and increase the effectiveness of independent learning resources in flipped classroom settings. Future research should validate this checklist across multiple institutions and assess its impact on objective learning outcomes.

BMC Medical Education
Boston University (US)
International Association of Medical Science Educators
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon