Frailty Assessment Tools for Adults with Obesity: A Scoping Review

Abstract Purpose To identify, classify, and compare available tools for frailty assessment in adults with obesity. Methods A scoping review was conducted across five databases, including grey literature searches and an ascendancy approach. Seventeen studies were included, with a total sample size of 4,953,011 participants, of whom 4,931,181 were adults with obesity (99.56% of the total sample). Data on sample characteristics, assessment tools, and outcomes were extracted. Results The most common methodological approach was comorbidity-based instruments, used in 9 of the 17 included studies (52.9%), followed by syndrome-based instruments (4/17; 23.5%), performance-based instruments (2/17; 11.8%), and population-specific instruments (2/17; 11.8%). Among the ten instruments identified, the Frailty Index (FI) was the most frequently used. Conclusion There are ten different instruments for frailty assessment in adults with obesity, they are heterogeneous and mainly focus on comorbidity-related aspects. Currently, none of the instruments, methods, or tools identified in this review comprehensively captured the multidimensional nature of frailty in this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obesity Surgery
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-026-08956-z
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Frailty Assessment Tools for Adults with Obesity: A Scoping Review

Bruna da Silveira, Darlan Laurício Matte, Gabriela Ferreira Guimarães, Amanda Farias e Farias
Obesity Surgery
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Frailty Assessment Tools for Adults with Obesity: A Scoping Review

Bruna da Silveira, Darlan Laurício Matte, Gabriela Ferreira Guimarães, Amanda Farias e Farias
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To identify, classify, and compare available tools for frailty assessment in adults with obesity. Methods A scoping review was conducted across five databases, including grey literature searches and an ascendancy approach. Seventeen studies were included, with a total sample size of 4,953,011 participants, of whom 4,931,181 were adults with obesity (99.56% of the total sample). Data on sample characteristics, assessment tools, and outcomes were extracted. Results The most common methodological approach was comorbidity-based instruments, used in 9 of the 17 included studies (52.9%), followed by syndrome-based instruments (4/17; 23.5%), performance-based instruments (2/17; 11.8%), and population-specific instruments (2/17; 11.8%). Among the ten instruments identified, the Frailty Index (FI) was the most frequently used. Conclusion There are ten different instruments for frailty assessment in adults with obesity, they are heterogeneous and mainly focus on comorbidity-related aspects. Currently, none of the instruments, methods, or tools identified in this review comprehensively captured the multidimensional nature of frailty in this population.

Obesity Surgery
Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon