Photograph-Based Skeletal Malocclusion Screening with Geometric Machine Learning: External Validation Across Turkish and Non-European Cohorts

A photograph based screening classifier for skeletal malocclusion maps 100 engineered geometric feature vectors, derived from a side-profile smartphone photograph, to orthodontic class labels, enabling non-invasive triage without radiographic imaging. This study reports external validation across two independent cohorts that contributed no cases to training. Two binary tasks were evaluated; Class III against non-Class III, and Class I against Class II; each with its own development set and model, applied without modification at the default threshold. One external cohort was Turkish, drawn from an institution not represented in the development set; the other was a non-European cohort from a Belgian private orthodontic clinic. Sensitivity, specificity and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were pre-specified as primary outcome measures, since none depends on outcome prevalence. In the Class III task, sensitivity was similar across all three evaluation sets (0.801, 0.836, 0.848; all adjusted p>0.7), while specificity fell from 0.766 in the Turkish external cohort to 0.697 in the non-European cohort. AUC was 0.902 and 0.835 respectively (difference 0.066; p=0.029). In the Class I and Class II task the corresponding values were 0.875 and 0.723 (difference 0.152; p<0.001). A subgroup analysis showed lower sensitivity in children than adults across both cohorts (0.71 to 0.80 versus 0.89 to 0.90). AUC was lower in the non-European cohort for all three models in both tasks. The observed performance differences are consistent with a population-specific generalizability effect rather than model-specific failure and support mandatory external validation on target populations before clinical deployment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
medRxiv
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.28.26366413
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
preprint

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Photograph-Based Skeletal Malocclusion Screening with Geometric Machine Learning: External Validation Across Turkish and Non-European Cohorts

Banu Kılıç, Berrak Çakmak, Ozgur Kilic, Ahmet Yağcı et al.
5 links
medRxiv
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
preprint

Photograph-Based Skeletal Malocclusion Screening with Geometric Machine Learning: External Validation Across Turkish and Non-European Cohorts

Banu Kılıç, Berrak Çakmak, Ozgur Kilic, Ahmet Yağcı, Cenk Ahmet Akcan, Mehmet Cihan Sakman, Tuğba Önal-Süzek, Yunus Emre Uçaker, Emmanuel Jr. Dumu, Asli Eker Davut
preprint en

Abstract

A photograph based screening classifier for skeletal malocclusion maps 100 engineered geometric feature vectors, derived from a side-profile smartphone photograph, to orthodontic class labels, enabling non-invasive triage without radiographic imaging. This study reports external validation across two independent cohorts that contributed no cases to training. Two binary tasks were evaluated; Class III against non-Class III, and Class I against Class II; each with its own development set and model, applied without modification at the default threshold. One external cohort was Turkish, drawn from an institution not represented in the development set; the other was a non-European cohort from a Belgian private orthodontic clinic. Sensitivity, specificity and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were pre-specified as primary outcome measures, since none depends on outcome prevalence. In the Class III task, sensitivity was similar across all three evaluation sets (0.801, 0.836, 0.848; all adjusted p>0.7), while specificity fell from 0.766 in the Turkish external cohort to 0.697 in the non-European cohort. AUC was 0.902 and 0.835 respectively (difference 0.066; p=0.029). In the Class I and Class II task the corresponding values were 0.875 and 0.723 (difference 0.152; p<0.001). A subgroup analysis showed lower sensitivity in children than adults across both cohorts (0.71 to 0.80 versus 0.89 to 0.90). AUC was lower in the non-European cohort for all three models in both tasks. The observed performance differences are consistent with a population-specific generalizability effect rather than model-specific failure and support mandatory external validation on target populations before clinical deployment.

medRxiv
Bezmiâlem Vakıf Üniversitesi (TR), Hacettepe University (TR), Muğla University (TR), ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH), Erciyes University (TR), Gazi University (TR)
European Commission, Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Good health and well-being
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon