When Two Intelligences Disagree: Verifiable Errors, Methodological Omissions, and Documentary Asymmetries in AI-Assisted Scientific Review / Cuando dos inteligencias discrepan: errores verificables, omisiones metodológicas y asimetrías documentales e

ENGLISH Retrospective documentary study of three differences between scientific manuscript assessments by Claude (AIR1) and ChatGPT (AIR2), prepared separately for works by the same author. It distinguishes an algebraically adjudicable objection concerning PEDOTEK1 electrical bounds, a methodological caution about causal interpretation in Contractor and Reyes, and unequal documentary coverage in originality screening. The analysis documents a subsequent correction and restricts comparisons to identified manuscript versions. These cases do not establish relative error rates or general superiority of either model. Version 1. English and Spanish editions deposited together. ESPAÑOL Estudio documental retrospectivo de tres diferencias entre dictámenes de Claude (AIR1) y ChatGPT (AIR2), preparados por separado sobre manuscritos científicos del mismo autor. Distingue una objeción adjudicable por álgebra sobre las cotas eléctricas de PEDOTEK1, una cautela metodológica sobre la interpretación causal de Contractor y Reyes y una cobertura documental desigual en el control de originalidad. El análisis registra una rectificación posterior y limita las comparaciones a versiones identificadas de los manuscritos. Estos casos no permiten comparar tasas de error ni establecer superioridad general de ningún modelo. Versión 1. Ediciones inglesa y española depositadas juntas.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23782675
Primary Topic
Academic Writing and Publishing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Two Intelligences Disagree: Verifiable Errors, Methodological Omissions, and Documentary Asymmetries in AI-Assisted Scientific Review / Cuando dos inteligencias discrepan: errores verificables, omisiones metodológicas y asimetrías documentales e

Juan Segurola
1 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Academic Writing and Publishing
article

When Two Intelligences Disagree: Verifiable Errors, Methodological Omissions, and Documentary Asymmetries in AI-Assisted Scientific Review / Cuando dos inteligencias discrepan: errores verificables, omisiones metodológicas y asimetrías documentales e

Juan Segurola
article en

Abstract

ENGLISH Retrospective documentary study of three differences between scientific manuscript assessments by Claude (AIR1) and ChatGPT (AIR2), prepared separately for works by the same author. It distinguishes an algebraically adjudicable objection concerning PEDOTEK1 electrical bounds, a methodological caution about causal interpretation in Contractor and Reyes, and unequal documentary coverage in originality screening. The analysis documents a subsequent correction and restricts comparisons to identified manuscript versions. These cases do not establish relative error rates or general superiority of either model. Version 1. English and Spanish editions deposited together. ESPAÑOL Estudio documental retrospectivo de tres diferencias entre dictámenes de Claude (AIR1) y ChatGPT (AIR2), preparados por separado sobre manuscritos científicos del mismo autor. Distingue una objeción adjudicable por álgebra sobre las cotas eléctricas de PEDOTEK1, una cautela metodológica sobre la interpretación causal de Contractor y Reyes y una cobertura documental desigual en el control de originalidad. El análisis registra una rectificación posterior y limita las comparaciones a versiones identificadas de los manuscritos. Estos casos no permiten comparar tasas de error ni establecer superioridad general de ningún modelo. Versión 1. Ediciones inglesa y española depositadas juntas.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Academic Writing and Publishing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon