The future of foreign language education: Generative AI scientists’ perspective

Abstract With the rapid advancement of Generative AI (GenAI), debates have emerged about whether AI systems might replace human teachers in foreign language (FL) education. Using an adapted Technology Acceptance Model (TAM and TAM2) tailored to scientists, this study investigates the anticipated role of GenAI in FL education and scientists’ willingness to advocate its adoption. Based on questionnaire responses from 161 bilingual or multilingual GenAI scientists, the mixed‐methods study found that GenAI is generally perceived as useful and acceptable for FL education, but not as a replacement for teachers. They envision a future in which GenAI augments instruction while educators shift toward roles involving mentorship, cultural mediation, and ethical oversight. The findings suggest that GenAI adoption requires a human‐centered approach prioritizing output quality, trust, responsible use, and professional development, emphasizing augmentation over automation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foreign Language Annals
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.70083
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The future of foreign language education: Generative AI scientists’ perspective

Ishita Prasad, Suyi Liu, Linda Aidong Zhang, Yulian Wang et al.
8 links
Foreign Language Annals
Artificial Intelligence in Education
article

The future of foreign language education: Generative AI scientists’ perspective

Ishita Prasad, Suyi Liu, Linda Aidong Zhang, Yulian Wang, Sushant Mehta
article en

Abstract

Abstract With the rapid advancement of Generative AI (GenAI), debates have emerged about whether AI systems might replace human teachers in foreign language (FL) education. Using an adapted Technology Acceptance Model (TAM and TAM2) tailored to scientists, this study investigates the anticipated role of GenAI in FL education and scientists’ willingness to advocate its adoption. Based on questionnaire responses from 161 bilingual or multilingual GenAI scientists, the mixed‐methods study found that GenAI is generally perceived as useful and acceptable for FL education, but not as a replacement for teachers. They envision a future in which GenAI augments instruction while educators shift toward roles involving mentorship, cultural mediation, and ethical oversight. The findings suggest that GenAI adoption requires a human‐centered approach prioritizing output quality, trust, responsible use, and professional development, emphasizing augmentation over automation.

Foreign Language Annals
Wayne State College (US), Google (United States) (US), Meta (Israel) (IL), Meta (United States) (US), Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center (US)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Artificial Intelligence in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
The future of foreign language education: Generative AI scientists’ perspective — Ishita Prasad, Suyi Liu, et al. · Foreign Language Annals (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS