Individualized brain-body signatures of positive emotions revealed by large-scale multimodal neurophysiological recording

Using one of the most comprehensive multimodal biosensing datasets in affective research, densely sampled within individuals, we asked how emotions are instantiated in each person's brain and body. Four participants viewed 168 emotion-evoking videos during 128-channel EEG and 28 autonomic, ocular and facial recordings. Cross-validated elastic-net classifiers distinguished each of 15 positive and neutral emotions from baseline in every participant (mean accuracy 87-97%). We found that no emotion was predicted by a single marker and each reflected a multimodal ensemble of cortical and autonomic activity whose composition was largely person-specific. Yet physiology-derived groupings converged selectively with self-report; Interest-Awe-Amusement-Satisfaction and Entrancement-Aesthetic Appreciation recurred across individuals based on physiology. Across emotion groups, frontal and posterior delta, posterior alpha and electrodermal activity formed a shared backbone, plausibly reflecting affective and sensory engagement, whereas cardiovascular and facial signals varied between people. This framework yields individualized, objective neurophysiological indicators of emotion, potentially aiding personalized diagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.23.761434
Primary Topic
Emotion and Mood Recognition
Type
preprint

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Individualized brain-body signatures of positive emotions revealed by large-scale multimodal neurophysiological recording

Roger Anguera‐Singla, Jennifer D. Townsend, Bijurika Nandi, Reza Abbasi-Asl et al.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Emotion and Mood Recognition
preprint

Individualized brain-body signatures of positive emotions revealed by large-scale multimodal neurophysiological recording

Roger Anguera‐Singla, Jennifer D. Townsend, Bijurika Nandi, Reza Abbasi-Asl, Maryam Bijanzadeh, Adam H. Gazzaley, David A. Ziegler, Theodore P. Zanto, Richard Campusano, Bhavesh Kalisetti, Isabella Hartley, Vincent Wang, Melissa Osheroff
preprint en

Abstract

Using one of the most comprehensive multimodal biosensing datasets in affective research, densely sampled within individuals, we asked how emotions are instantiated in each person's brain and body. Four participants viewed 168 emotion-evoking videos during 128-channel EEG and 28 autonomic, ocular and facial recordings. Cross-validated elastic-net classifiers distinguished each of 15 positive and neutral emotions from baseline in every participant (mean accuracy 87-97%). We found that no emotion was predicted by a single marker and each reflected a multimodal ensemble of cortical and autonomic activity whose composition was largely person-specific. Yet physiology-derived groupings converged selectively with self-report; Interest-Awe-Amusement-Satisfaction and Entrancement-Aesthetic Appreciation recurred across individuals based on physiology. Across emotion groups, frontal and posterior delta, posterior alpha and electrodermal activity formed a shared backbone, plausibly reflecting affective and sensory engagement, whereas cardiovascular and facial signals varied between people. This framework yields individualized, objective neurophysiological indicators of emotion, potentially aiding personalized diagnosis.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
University of California, San Francisco (US)
University of California, San Francisco, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco
Good health and well-being
Emotion and Mood Recognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon