Foregrounded by AI: What a Sociomaterial Account of Literacy Implies for Postdigital Design Orientations

Abstract This article argues that Large Language Models (LLMs) reveal literacy’s sociomaterial character: that it is constituted within more-than-human assemblages of people, texts, technologies, practices, and infrastructures, rather than in the cognitive capacity of the individual. Rather than asking what new literacies Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) demands, it asks what LLMs reveal about literacy itself. This analysis draws on the sociomaterial tradition in science and technology studies, including actor-network theory, spatial perspectives, and postdigital literacy research. It reconceptualises literacy as emergent practice within assemblages, arguing that competence frameworks, by centring the individual, cannot register the distributed, infrastructural, and nonhuman dimensions of literacy that this shift makes visible. From this analysis, three design orientations for postdigital literacy environments are derived: making assemblages visible, sustaining fluid literacy spaces, and preserving conditions for critical reflexivity. The article concludes by arguing that these orientations carry political as well as pedagogical stakes, since current AI assemblages risk amplifying existing educational inequalities rather than benefiting all learners equally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Postdigital Science and Education
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-026-00716-7
Primary Topic
Digital Education and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Foregrounded by AI: What a Sociomaterial Account of Literacy Implies for Postdigital Design Orientations

Michael Schlauch
3 links
Postdigital Science and Education
Digital Education and Society
article

Foregrounded by AI: What a Sociomaterial Account of Literacy Implies for Postdigital Design Orientations

Michael Schlauch
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article argues that Large Language Models (LLMs) reveal literacy’s sociomaterial character: that it is constituted within more-than-human assemblages of people, texts, technologies, practices, and infrastructures, rather than in the cognitive capacity of the individual. Rather than asking what new literacies Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) demands, it asks what LLMs reveal about literacy itself. This analysis draws on the sociomaterial tradition in science and technology studies, including actor-network theory, spatial perspectives, and postdigital literacy research. It reconceptualises literacy as emergent practice within assemblages, arguing that competence frameworks, by centring the individual, cannot register the distributed, infrastructural, and nonhuman dimensions of literacy that this shift makes visible. From this analysis, three design orientations for postdigital literacy environments are derived: making assemblages visible, sustaining fluid literacy spaces, and preserving conditions for critical reflexivity. The article concludes by arguing that these orientations carry political as well as pedagogical stakes, since current AI assemblages risk amplifying existing educational inequalities rather than benefiting all learners equally.

Postdigital Science and Education
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Digital Education and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon