Post-psychedelic and meditation-related challenges: a protocol for a mixed-methods longitudinal-observational study

Introduction: Psychedelics and meditation are increasingly used for therapeutic and wellness purposes. However, research into adverse effects (AEs) has been limited, without adequate investigation of the nature, clinical characteristics, and diversity of persisting challenges following psychedelic use and meditation practice. This study aims to better characterize the clinical and contextual features of these challenges, describe their longitudinal course, and compare psychedelic-related challenges to meditation-related challenges, selected as comparator conditions given previously characterized phenomenological and contextual overlap between the two. Methods and Analysis: This is a mixed-methods, enriched-sample, active-comparator (psychedelics vs. meditation) observational study comprising (1) a cross-sectional retrospective survey (N = 1,600), (2) a prospective 12-month longitudinal design involving six bimonthly surveys (n = 800), (3) 12 weeks of weekly ambulatory assessments combining quantitative symptom ratings with narrative voice report (n = 40), and (4) qualitative interviews (n = 60). Participants are recruited into two parallel arms of 800 each: individuals reporting psychedelic-related challenges and individuals reporting meditation-related challenges, defined as distress or impairment persisting after the acute effects of a psychedelic experience or period of meditation practice have subsided. Data collection includes a tailored item pool aimed at capturing the symptoms and phenomenology of these challenges in detail, developed from qualitative research and collaboratively with stakeholders with lived experience. The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) and measures of agent/exposure, set, setting, and social response are administered to characterize biopsychosocial correlates and functional impacts of AEs. Initial analyses will describe the phenomenology, course, and functional impact of psychedelic- and meditation-related challenges, and evaluate the structure and psychometric properties of the novel item pool. The study will produce a publicly available de-identified dataset supporting subsequent analyses, such as correspondence with recognized clinical syndromes, trajectory characterization, and cross-arm comparison of measurement structure, reported in registered reports or preregistrations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
medRxiv
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.26.26366468
Primary Topic
Psychedelics and Drug Studies
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Post-psychedelic and meditation-related challenges: a protocol for a mixed-methods longitudinal-observational study

Willoughby B. Britton, Nicholas K. Canby, Charles L. Raison, Nicholas T. Van Dam et al.
1 links
medRxiv
Psychedelics and Drug Studies
preprint

Post-psychedelic and meditation-related challenges: a protocol for a mixed-methods longitudinal-observational study

Willoughby B. Britton, Nicholas K. Canby, Charles L. Raison, Nicholas T. Van Dam, Joshua Lipson, Santiago Jose Arconada Alvarez, Todd Korthuis, Boadie Waid Dunlop, Holly Frances Levin-Aspenson, Roman Palitsky, Jessica L. Maples‐Keller, Deanna M. Kaplan, Barbara Rothbaum, Zainab Salako, Adie Rae
preprint en

Abstract

Introduction: Psychedelics and meditation are increasingly used for therapeutic and wellness purposes. However, research into adverse effects (AEs) has been limited, without adequate investigation of the nature, clinical characteristics, and diversity of persisting challenges following psychedelic use and meditation practice. This study aims to better characterize the clinical and contextual features of these challenges, describe their longitudinal course, and compare psychedelic-related challenges to meditation-related challenges, selected as comparator conditions given previously characterized phenomenological and contextual overlap between the two. Methods and Analysis: This is a mixed-methods, enriched-sample, active-comparator (psychedelics vs. meditation) observational study comprising (1) a cross-sectional retrospective survey (N = 1,600), (2) a prospective 12-month longitudinal design involving six bimonthly surveys (n = 800), (3) 12 weeks of weekly ambulatory assessments combining quantitative symptom ratings with narrative voice report (n = 40), and (4) qualitative interviews (n = 60). Participants are recruited into two parallel arms of 800 each: individuals reporting psychedelic-related challenges and individuals reporting meditation-related challenges, defined as distress or impairment persisting after the acute effects of a psychedelic experience or period of meditation practice have subsided. Data collection includes a tailored item pool aimed at capturing the symptoms and phenomenology of these challenges in detail, developed from qualitative research and collaboratively with stakeholders with lived experience. The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) and measures of agent/exposure, set, setting, and social response are administered to characterize biopsychosocial correlates and functional impacts of AEs. Initial analyses will describe the phenomenology, course, and functional impact of psychedelic- and meditation-related challenges, and evaluate the structure and psychometric properties of the novel item pool. The study will produce a publicly available de-identified dataset supporting subsequent analyses, such as correspondence with recognized clinical syndromes, trajectory characterization, and cross-arm comparison of measurement structure, reported in registered reports or preregistrations.

medRxiv
University of North Texas (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Emory University (US), Oregon Health & Science University (US), The University of Melbourne (AU), Augusta University (US), Brown University (US)
Good health and well-being
Psychedelics and Drug Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon