Establishment of a Method for Detecting BRAF V600E Mutation Using an Epitaxial Probe - Fluorescence Quantitative PCR with the classical four - primer ARMS - PCR Architecture

Abstract This study presents an innovative Epitaxial Probe-Allelic Specific PCR (EPAS‑PCR) for highly sensitive and specific fluorescence detection of the BRAF V600E mutation. By attaching a target‑unrelated extension sequence to the 5′ end of the inner allele‑specific primer and pairing it with a universal primer and a TaqMan probe, the method converts the classical four‑primer Amplification Refractory Mutation System PCR (ARMS‑PCR) into a closed‑tube real‑time qPCR system, eliminating gel electrophoresis. The core innovation decouples and cascades mutation recognition with signal generation: only when the inner primer specifically extends the mutant template does the downstream probe system produce fluorescence. The outer primer F1 contributes pre‑amplification and competitively suppresses wild‑type non‑specific amplification. Using Taq polymerase lacking 3′→5′ exonuclease activity is critical for specificity. The assay exhibits good linearity (R² ≥ 0.99) from 1 × 10⁴ to 1 × 10⁸ copies/μL. In plasmid mixtures, it detects 0.137% mutant fraction at 10⁶ copies/reaction and 0.412% at 10⁴ copies/reaction; in genomic DNA standards, the limit of detection is 0.2%, superior to conventional ARMS‑PCR. Compared with ARMS‑PCR, EPAS‑PCR avoids the sensitivity loss and non‑specificity risks arising from omitting outer primers and introducing extra mismatches. Direct comparison shows that ARMS‑PCR without F1 produces false positives around cycle 40, whereas complete EPAS‑PCR remains signal‑free up to 50 cycles. The EPAS‑PCR method offers advantages such as modular design, straightforward development, and reliable performance. In addition to detecting the BRAF V600E mutation, it is also applicable to the detection of other nucleic acid point mutations, representing a novel strategy with broad application prospects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biology Methods and Protocols
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/biomethods/bpag059
Primary Topic
Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Establishment of a Method for Detecting BRAF V600E Mutation Using an Epitaxial Probe - Fluorescence Quantitative PCR with the classical four - primer ARMS - PCR Architecture

Wenjing Du, Chaoran Xia, Binbin Dong, Qianwen Li et al.
Biology Methods and Protocols
Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
article

Establishment of a Method for Detecting BRAF V600E Mutation Using an Epitaxial Probe - Fluorescence Quantitative PCR with the classical four - primer ARMS - PCR Architecture

Wenjing Du, Chaoran Xia, Binbin Dong, Qianwen Li, Yongchen Yang, Yuming Gong
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study presents an innovative Epitaxial Probe-Allelic Specific PCR (EPAS‑PCR) for highly sensitive and specific fluorescence detection of the BRAF V600E mutation. By attaching a target‑unrelated extension sequence to the 5′ end of the inner allele‑specific primer and pairing it with a universal primer and a TaqMan probe, the method converts the classical four‑primer Amplification Refractory Mutation System PCR (ARMS‑PCR) into a closed‑tube real‑time qPCR system, eliminating gel electrophoresis. The core innovation decouples and cascades mutation recognition with signal generation: only when the inner primer specifically extends the mutant template does the downstream probe system produce fluorescence. The outer primer F1 contributes pre‑amplification and competitively suppresses wild‑type non‑specific amplification. Using Taq polymerase lacking 3′→5′ exonuclease activity is critical for specificity. The assay exhibits good linearity (R² ≥ 0.99) from 1 × 10⁴ to 1 × 10⁸ copies/μL. In plasmid mixtures, it detects 0.137% mutant fraction at 10⁶ copies/reaction and 0.412% at 10⁴ copies/reaction; in genomic DNA standards, the limit of detection is 0.2%, superior to conventional ARMS‑PCR. Compared with ARMS‑PCR, EPAS‑PCR avoids the sensitivity loss and non‑specificity risks arising from omitting outer primers and introducing extra mismatches. Direct comparison shows that ARMS‑PCR without F1 produces false positives around cycle 40, whereas complete EPAS‑PCR remains signal‑free up to 50 cycles. The EPAS‑PCR method offers advantages such as modular design, straightforward development, and reliable performance. In addition to detecting the BRAF V600E mutation, it is also applicable to the detection of other nucleic acid point mutations, representing a novel strategy with broad application prospects.

Biology Methods and Protocols
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Fudan University (CN), Shanghai Children's Hospital (CN), Huashan Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon