Automated evaluation of a key comparison on gauge blocks applying the digital calibration certificate (DCC) and digital metrological expert (DME)

Abstract This article provides a demonstration of the capabilities of the digital metrological expert (DME) in facilitating the evaluation of interlaboratory comparison results, for the first time in the field of dimensional measurements. Using the example case of gauge blocks, it is shown how data provided by the digital calibration certificate (DCC) XML schema enable the automated evaluation of the comparison based on machine-interpretable data formats. Therefore, a simulated interlaboratory comparison with artificial gauge block measurement results acts as a proof-of-principle test to assess the combination of DCC and DME close to practice. Applying automated statistical analyses, including the calculation of reference values, degrees of equivalence, and detection of outliers at a level of significance of 5 %, the DME allows for the assessment of different evaluation methods to select suitable approaches. Compared to the usual practice of a (semi-)manual evaluation of intercomparisons carried out by human experts, the key benefits include reduced time and effort, consistency in results, and the potential prevention of human errors. The demonstration paves the way for easy adaptation to similar use cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Measurement Science and Technology
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/aeb042
Primary Topic
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automated evaluation of a key comparison on gauge blocks applying the digital calibration certificate (DCC) and digital metrological expert (DME)

Andrew J Lewis, Georg Zechner, Guido Bartl, Antti Lassila et al.
2 links
Measurement Science and Technology
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
article

Automated evaluation of a key comparison on gauge blocks applying the digital calibration certificate (DCC) and digital metrological expert (DME)

Andrew J Lewis, Georg Zechner, Guido Bartl, Antti Lassila, Daniel Hutzschenreuter, Richard Koops, Hugo Gasca-Aragon
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article provides a demonstration of the capabilities of the digital metrological expert (DME) in facilitating the evaluation of interlaboratory comparison results, for the first time in the field of dimensional measurements. Using the example case of gauge blocks, it is shown how data provided by the digital calibration certificate (DCC) XML schema enable the automated evaluation of the comparison based on machine-interpretable data formats. Therefore, a simulated interlaboratory comparison with artificial gauge block measurement results acts as a proof-of-principle test to assess the combination of DCC and DME close to practice. Applying automated statistical analyses, including the calculation of reference values, degrees of equivalence, and detection of outliers at a level of significance of 5 %, the DME allows for the assessment of different evaluation methods to select suitable approaches. Compared to the usual practice of a (semi-)manual evaluation of intercomparisons carried out by human experts, the key benefits include reduced time and effort, consistency in results, and the potential prevention of human errors. The demonstration paves the way for easy adaptation to similar use cases.

Measurement Science and TechnologyVol. 37(43)
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (DE), National metrology institute VTT MIKES (FI), National Physical Laboratory (GB), Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying (AT), VSL National Metrology Institute (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon