Gender-specific profiles of left-wing extremists: a comparative analysis of male and female risk factors for radicalization

This study investigates gender dynamics in left-wing extremism by examining how women enter radical milieus, what motivates them, and how their roles compare to those of men. Drawing on data from PIRUS (Profiles of Individual Radicalization in the USA), the analysis focuses on 85 female and 226 male individuals who have been recorded as left-wing extremists since 2000. Using chi-square tests, the study reveals that women exhibited fewer individual risk factors, such as grievances or disintegration, yet were equally represented in leadership as men. Moreover, the data suggest that familial networks, close personal ties, and involvement in legal protest organizations play a more prominent role for women. Besides these differences, similar correlations for engagement in targeted violence against people were identified in separate analyses for women and men. The study concludes by discussing the implications of these findings for gender-sensitive prevention strategies, tailored intervention programs, and more nuanced deradicalization approaches.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2026.2754533
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender-specific profiles of left-wing extremists: a comparative analysis of male and female risk factors for radicalization

Daniel Köehler, Irina Jugl-Kuntzsch
Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
article

Gender-specific profiles of left-wing extremists: a comparative analysis of male and female risk factors for radicalization

Daniel Köehler, Irina Jugl-Kuntzsch
article en

Abstract

This study investigates gender dynamics in left-wing extremism by examining how women enter radical milieus, what motivates them, and how their roles compare to those of men. Drawing on data from PIRUS (Profiles of Individual Radicalization in the USA), the analysis focuses on 85 female and 226 male individuals who have been recorded as left-wing extremists since 2000. Using chi-square tests, the study reveals that women exhibited fewer individual risk factors, such as grievances or disintegration, yet were equally represented in leadership as men. Moreover, the data suggest that familial networks, close personal ties, and involvement in legal protest organizations play a more prominent role for women. Besides these differences, similar correlations for engagement in targeted violence against people were identified in separate analyses for women and men. The study concludes by discussing the implications of these findings for gender-sensitive prevention strategies, tailored intervention programs, and more nuanced deradicalization approaches.

Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon