Segregated Power: Women’s Underrepresentation and Committee Assignments in the Canadian Parliament

Abstract Parliamentary committees are critical venues of legislative work. Yet women, already underrepresented in most legislatures, are often further marginalized within these powerful substructures. This note examines women’s representation in the Canadian House of Commons’ 24 standing committees, 2006–2025, using an original dataset capturing committee membership and leadership across six Parliaments and four major parties. Our analyses reveal women’s representation as committee members and leaders generally tracks their presence in the House of Commons but gender segregation remains entrenched. Women are overrepresented on “feminine”-coded committees and underrepresented on “masculine”-coded committees. Women are also less likely to hold leadership roles, particularly on “masculine”-coded committees. Contrary to expectations from comparative research, we find limited partisan variation. Shaped by opaque party processes, committee assignments reflect and reproduce gendered institutional logics that privilege men and masculine policy domains, even amid rising descriptive representation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Political Science
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008423926101383
Primary Topic
Gender Politics and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Segregated Power: Women’s Underrepresentation and Committee Assignments in the Canadian Parliament

Elizabeth Goodyear‐Grant, Elizabeth Baisley, Kevin Arnel
2 links
Canadian Journal of Political Science
Gender Politics and Representation
article

Segregated Power: Women’s Underrepresentation and Committee Assignments in the Canadian Parliament

Elizabeth Goodyear‐Grant, Elizabeth Baisley, Kevin Arnel
article en

Abstract

Abstract Parliamentary committees are critical venues of legislative work. Yet women, already underrepresented in most legislatures, are often further marginalized within these powerful substructures. This note examines women’s representation in the Canadian House of Commons’ 24 standing committees, 2006–2025, using an original dataset capturing committee membership and leadership across six Parliaments and four major parties. Our analyses reveal women’s representation as committee members and leaders generally tracks their presence in the House of Commons but gender segregation remains entrenched. Women are overrepresented on “feminine”-coded committees and underrepresented on “masculine”-coded committees. Women are also less likely to hold leadership roles, particularly on “masculine”-coded committees. Contrary to expectations from comparative research, we find limited partisan variation. Shaped by opaque party processes, committee assignments reflect and reproduce gendered institutional logics that privilege men and masculine policy domains, even amid rising descriptive representation.

Canadian Journal of Political Science
University of Ottawa (CA), Queen's University (CA), Queens University (BD)
Gender equality, Reduced inequalities, Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Gender Politics and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon