Large Language Models for Course Recommendation on Mooc Platforms: A Review

Learners on a massive open online course (MOOC) platform choose from thousands of courses, and recommender systems have long been used to narrow that choice. Since 2022 a new ingredient has arrived: large language models, which can read course descriptions, rank candidates from a prompt, hold a conversation about a learner's goals and write a reason for each suggestion. This review asks what those models change for course recommendation and how much of the claimed benefit has been shown on educational data. We sketch the earlier MOOC recommenders and their datasets only briefly, then take four roles of a language model in turn: text encoder, ranker, conversational recommender and explanation writer. Most of the evidence for these roles comes from films, books and retail products. Studies on course data exist, but they are few, recent and almost all offline. We then look at how such systems are evaluated, where offline scores mislead, and the risks that weigh most in education: invented courses or prerequisites, popularity and provider bias, unequal treatment of learner groups, privacy and cost. This is a review of published work. No new experiment is reported.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Information Technology Research Studies (IJITRS)
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63090/ijitrs/3139.3209.0039
Primary Topic
Recommender Systems and Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Large Language Models for Course Recommendation on Mooc Platforms: A Review

M Keerthika
2 links
International Journal of Information Technology Research Studies (IJITRS)
Recommender Systems and Techniques
article

Large Language Models for Course Recommendation on Mooc Platforms: A Review

M Keerthika
article en

Abstract

Learners on a massive open online course (MOOC) platform choose from thousands of courses, and recommender systems have long been used to narrow that choice. Since 2022 a new ingredient has arrived: large language models, which can read course descriptions, rank candidates from a prompt, hold a conversation about a learner's goals and write a reason for each suggestion. This review asks what those models change for course recommendation and how much of the claimed benefit has been shown on educational data. We sketch the earlier MOOC recommenders and their datasets only briefly, then take four roles of a language model in turn: text encoder, ranker, conversational recommender and explanation writer. Most of the evidence for these roles comes from films, books and retail products. Studies on course data exist, but they are few, recent and almost all offline. We then look at how such systems are evaluated, where offline scores mislead, and the risks that weigh most in education: invented courses or prerequisites, popularity and provider bias, unequal treatment of learner groups, privacy and cost. This is a review of published work. No new experiment is reported.

International Journal of Information Technology Research Studies (IJITRS)Vol. 2(4)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Recommender Systems and Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Large Language Models for Course Recommendation on Mooc Platforms: A Review — M Keerthika · International Journal of Information Technology Research Studies (IJITRS) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS