Attitude Toward Persons With Mental Illness in Bangladesh: Scale Validation and Status Assessment

ABSTRACT Background Stigma toward persons with mental illness remains a major barrier to mental health care. No validated Bangla instrument is available to assess attitudes toward persons with mental illness in Bangladesh. Objective This study aimed to adapt and validate the culturally adapted Bangla version of the Attitudes Toward Persons with Mental Illness (APMI) scale and to assess attitudes among undergraduate medical students and Islamic religious leaders in Bangladesh. Methods A psychometric validation study was conducted from July 2025 to June 2026 among 489 participants (249 medical students and 240 Imams). The original 16‐item APMI scale was translated and culturally adapted following standard guidelines. The sample was independently divided into exploratory factor analysis (EFA; n = 245) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; n = 244) subsamples. EFA used polychoric correlations, minimum residual extraction, oblimin rotation, and parallel analysis. CFA compared one‐ and two‐factor models using the WLSMV estimator. Reliability, measurement invariance, group differences, and multivariable associations were also evaluated. Results EFA supported a two‐factor structure comprising Fear/Social Avoidance and Interpersonal Acceptance. The correlated two‐factor CFA model showed substantially better fit than the one‐factor model (scaled CFI = 0.967, TLI = 0.956, RMSEA = 0.071, 90% CI 0.049–0.092, SRMR = 0.046). Ordinal alpha was 0.83 and 0.78. Measurement invariance was supported at the configural, partial metric, and partial threshold/scalar levels. Medical students had lower scores than Imams. After adjustment, the difference remained significant ( β = 5.02, 95% CI 2.89–7.15; p < 0.001). Conclusion The 10‐item culturally adapted Bangla APMI scale demonstrates acceptable structural validity and internal consistency for assessing attitudes toward persons with mental illness for Bangla‐speaking populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Health Challenges
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/puh2.70432
Primary Topic
Mental Health Treatment and Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Attitude Toward Persons With Mental Illness in Bangladesh: Scale Validation and Status Assessment

Mohammad Sorowar Hossain, Sanjida Tanjin Khan, Bithika Mali, Maliha Huq et al.
4 links
Public Health Challenges
Mental Health Treatment and Access
article

Attitude Toward Persons With Mental Illness in Bangladesh: Scale Validation and Status Assessment

Mohammad Sorowar Hossain, Sanjida Tanjin Khan, Bithika Mali, Maliha Huq, S. M. Yasir Arafat, Srijony Ahmed, Sadeed Hossain, Md. Khairul Islam, Farhana Kaniz Mouri
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Stigma toward persons with mental illness remains a major barrier to mental health care. No validated Bangla instrument is available to assess attitudes toward persons with mental illness in Bangladesh. Objective This study aimed to adapt and validate the culturally adapted Bangla version of the Attitudes Toward Persons with Mental Illness (APMI) scale and to assess attitudes among undergraduate medical students and Islamic religious leaders in Bangladesh. Methods A psychometric validation study was conducted from July 2025 to June 2026 among 489 participants (249 medical students and 240 Imams). The original 16‐item APMI scale was translated and culturally adapted following standard guidelines. The sample was independently divided into exploratory factor analysis (EFA; n = 245) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; n = 244) subsamples. EFA used polychoric correlations, minimum residual extraction, oblimin rotation, and parallel analysis. CFA compared one‐ and two‐factor models using the WLSMV estimator. Reliability, measurement invariance, group differences, and multivariable associations were also evaluated. Results EFA supported a two‐factor structure comprising Fear/Social Avoidance and Interpersonal Acceptance. The correlated two‐factor CFA model showed substantially better fit than the one‐factor model (scaled CFI = 0.967, TLI = 0.956, RMSEA = 0.071, 90% CI 0.049–0.092, SRMR = 0.046). Ordinal alpha was 0.83 and 0.78. Measurement invariance was supported at the configural, partial metric, and partial threshold/scalar levels. Medical students had lower scores than Imams. After adjustment, the difference remained significant ( β = 5.02, 95% CI 2.89–7.15; p < 0.001). Conclusion The 10‐item culturally adapted Bangla APMI scale demonstrates acceptable structural validity and internal consistency for assessing attitudes toward persons with mental illness for Bangla‐speaking populations.

Public Health ChallengesVol. 5(4)
Bangladesh Medical University (BD), Independent University, Bangladesh (BD), Women Medical College (PK), Biomedical Research Foundation (BD), Medical College For Women and Hospital (BD)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Mental Health Treatment and Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon