Understanding intravaginal practices for gynecologic health among Haitian migrant women: A mixed-methods analysis

Haitian migrant women in the U.S. experience disproportionate rates of cervical cancer. Intravaginal practices (IVPs) are widely used among Haitian women and have been linked to an increased risk of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Although IVPs are well-documented in the Haitian community, little is known about Haitian migrant women's perceptions and motivations underlying their use. This exploratory sequential mixed-methods study examined Haitian migrant women's motivations for engaging in IVPs, products used for IVPs, and indications for their use. A convenience sample of Haitian migrant women in South Florida were recruited through active and passive recruitment approaches in community-based centers. Semi-structured qualitative interviews (n = 25) explored perceptions, motivations, and products used for IVPs. Qualitative results informed the development of survey items measuring IVPs, which were administered to participants (n = 151). Chi-square analysis with a Bonferroni adjustment examined associations between IVP products and IVP indications. All women in the qualitative sample (n = 25, 100%) confirmed IVP use compared to 68.9% (n = 104) of women in the quantitative sample. Qualitative interviews revealed that IVP preferences were rooted in cultural expectations with most women starting these practices either during puberty or after sexual debut. IVP products (e.g., plant and herbal agents, astringent washes, and antibiotics) were often chosen based on specific gynecologic indications, with this finding being consistent across both samples. Pigeon pea (pwa kongo) was the most frequently used IVP product in the quantitative sample (n = 74, 71.2%) and was associated with nearly all IVP indications (p ≤ 0.004). Given the high prevalence of IVPs in our sample, researchers and practitioners should further examine the meaningful health risks and protective effects associated with IVPs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0007394
Primary Topic
Women's cancer prevention and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding intravaginal practices for gynecologic health among Haitian migrant women: A mixed-methods analysis

Ashley Gresh, Joyline Chepkorir, Laetitia Mélissande Amédée, Kamila Anise Alexander et al.
1 links
PLOS Global Public Health
Women's cancer prevention and management
article

Understanding intravaginal practices for gynecologic health among Haitian migrant women: A mixed-methods analysis

Ashley Gresh, Joyline Chepkorir, Laetitia Mélissande Amédée, Kamila Anise Alexander, Dominique M. Guillaume, Maria Alcaide, Ann Augustin, Laeticia Jean Baptiste
article en

Abstract

Haitian migrant women in the U.S. experience disproportionate rates of cervical cancer. Intravaginal practices (IVPs) are widely used among Haitian women and have been linked to an increased risk of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Although IVPs are well-documented in the Haitian community, little is known about Haitian migrant women's perceptions and motivations underlying their use. This exploratory sequential mixed-methods study examined Haitian migrant women's motivations for engaging in IVPs, products used for IVPs, and indications for their use. A convenience sample of Haitian migrant women in South Florida were recruited through active and passive recruitment approaches in community-based centers. Semi-structured qualitative interviews (n = 25) explored perceptions, motivations, and products used for IVPs. Qualitative results informed the development of survey items measuring IVPs, which were administered to participants (n = 151). Chi-square analysis with a Bonferroni adjustment examined associations between IVP products and IVP indications. All women in the qualitative sample (n = 25, 100%) confirmed IVP use compared to 68.9% (n = 104) of women in the quantitative sample. Qualitative interviews revealed that IVP preferences were rooted in cultural expectations with most women starting these practices either during puberty or after sexual debut. IVP products (e.g., plant and herbal agents, astringent washes, and antibiotics) were often chosen based on specific gynecologic indications, with this finding being consistent across both samples. Pigeon pea (pwa kongo) was the most frequently used IVP product in the quantitative sample (n = 74, 71.2%) and was associated with nearly all IVP indications (p ≤ 0.004). Given the high prevalence of IVPs in our sample, researchers and practitioners should further examine the meaningful health risks and protective effects associated with IVPs.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 6(10)
Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Miami (US), New York University (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US), McMaster University (CA)
Johns Hopkins University, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Nursing Research
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Women's cancer prevention and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon