The role of surface texture parameters in optical form error measurements accuracy and precision of additively manufactured components

Abstract Additively manufactured (AM) workpieces often undergo secondary machining operations to meet functional and geometric requirements, which can affect the optical properties of the surface, and thereby the performance of optical measurement systems. This study investigates which surface texture parameters most significantly influence the accuracy and precision of form error measurements obtained using a fringe projection (FP) system. Four AM workpieces, two as-built and two with secondary milling operations, were measured under five different exposure time settings ranging from 50 ms to 250 ms. Measurement accuracy was assessed by calculating form error bias relative to a reference surface acquired via contact measurements on a coordinate measuring machine (CMM). On the other hand, measurement precision was assessed by evaluating the uncertainty of the form error using Monte Carlo simulation. This uncertainty was propagated from the reference ground-truth surface acquired with a CMM, incorporating the standard uncertainty component of the FP measurement procedure through a regional Gaussian Random Field (rGRF) model. Results show that height (i.e. S z , S q , S p , S pk ) and volume surface texture parameters (i.e. V mp , V vc ) are strongly correlated with bias, while functional, hybrid and spatial parameters (i.e. S mr , S dq , S dr , S al ) impact the measurement uncertainty. Additionally, the proposed methodology demonstrated robustness across evaluated exposure time settings, as bias and expanded uncertainty variations remained below 1.3% of the mean form error value and 8.3% of the mean flatness value, respectively. This suggests that, for the surface conditions and optical setup considered in this study, exposure time does not need to be manually tuned. These findings support the integration of surface texture analysis into optical form error measurement workflows, improving the reliability and automation of FP-based inspection in industrial AM applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Progress in Additive Manufacturing
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-026-02029-4
Primary Topic
Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of surface texture parameters in optical form error measurements accuracy and precision of additively manufactured components

Naiara Ortega, Samanta Piano, Soraya Plaza, Sofia Catalucci et al.
1 links
Progress in Additive Manufacturing
Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
article

The role of surface texture parameters in optical form error measurements accuracy and precision of additively manufactured components

Naiara Ortega, Samanta Piano, Soraya Plaza, Sofia Catalucci, Tibebe Tesfaye Yalew, Guillermo Vázquez González, X. Kong
article en

Abstract

Abstract Additively manufactured (AM) workpieces often undergo secondary machining operations to meet functional and geometric requirements, which can affect the optical properties of the surface, and thereby the performance of optical measurement systems. This study investigates which surface texture parameters most significantly influence the accuracy and precision of form error measurements obtained using a fringe projection (FP) system. Four AM workpieces, two as-built and two with secondary milling operations, were measured under five different exposure time settings ranging from 50 ms to 250 ms. Measurement accuracy was assessed by calculating form error bias relative to a reference surface acquired via contact measurements on a coordinate measuring machine (CMM). On the other hand, measurement precision was assessed by evaluating the uncertainty of the form error using Monte Carlo simulation. This uncertainty was propagated from the reference ground-truth surface acquired with a CMM, incorporating the standard uncertainty component of the FP measurement procedure through a regional Gaussian Random Field (rGRF) model. Results show that height (i.e. S z , S q , S p , S pk ) and volume surface texture parameters (i.e. V mp , V vc ) are strongly correlated with bias, while functional, hybrid and spatial parameters (i.e. S mr , S dq , S dr , S al ) impact the measurement uncertainty. Additionally, the proposed methodology demonstrated robustness across evaluated exposure time settings, as bias and expanded uncertainty variations remained below 1.3% of the mean form error value and 8.3% of the mean flatness value, respectively. This suggests that, for the surface conditions and optical setup considered in this study, exposure time does not need to be manually tuned. These findings support the integration of surface texture analysis into optical form error measurement workflows, improving the reliability and automation of FP-based inspection in industrial AM applications.

Progress in Additive Manufacturing
University of Padua (IT), University of Nottingham (GB), University of the Basque Country (ES)
Eusko Jaurlaritza, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon