Development of a climate change jurisdictional vulnerability index in South Africa

Climate change threatens ecosystems and human well-being, making the identification of regional vulnerabilities essential for targeted adaptation. This study developed a Climate Change Jurisdictional Vulnerability Index (CC-JVI) for South Africa through the integration of socio-economic indicators (Statistics South Africa) and environmental variables (NASA online database). Indicators were normalised and aggregated across exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity to compute provincial CC-JVI scores for two periods: 2001–2011 and 2012–2022. Comparative statistical analyses included the Shapiro–Wilk test for normality, paired-samples t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for temporal change, and Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests for interprovincial differences. Findings indicate marked spatial variation in vulnerability trajectories. KwaZulu-Natal exhibited the greatest variability, consistent with heightened extreme-weather exposure. Mpumalanga showed relative stability alongside a warming trend, while the Eastern Cape stabilised despite rising temperatures. Limpopo maintained a steady warming pattern and emerged as the most at-risk province. Classification results placed Eastern Cape, KwaZulu-Natal, and Mpumalanga as “Moderately vulnerable,” while Limpopo was “Vulnerable.” Normality testing suggested non-normal distributions for KwaZulu-Natal and Eastern Cape during 2001–2011, with improved normality in 2012–2022; Mpumalanga and Limpopo remained approximately normal across both periods. Significant temperature changes were detected for KwaZulu-Natal, Mpumalanga, and Eastern Cape, but not for Limpopo. Interprovincial differences in overall vulnerability were not statistically significant (Kruskal–Wallis χ²(3)=6.047, p=.109). The CC-JVI reveals persistent climatic and socio-economic disparities, supporting customised adaptation planning. Recommendations include strengthening climate data systems, prioritising education and infrastructure investment, mainstreaming adaptation into development plans, promoting provincial collaboration, securing international financing, and conducting periodic CC-JVI reassessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water and Environmental Sustainability
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52293/wes.1206.1118
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a climate change jurisdictional vulnerability index in South Africa

Bernard Moeketsi Hlalele
3 links
Water and Environmental Sustainability
Climate Change and Environmental Impact
article

Development of a climate change jurisdictional vulnerability index in South Africa

Bernard Moeketsi Hlalele
article en

Abstract

Climate change threatens ecosystems and human well-being, making the identification of regional vulnerabilities essential for targeted adaptation. This study developed a Climate Change Jurisdictional Vulnerability Index (CC-JVI) for South Africa through the integration of socio-economic indicators (Statistics South Africa) and environmental variables (NASA online database). Indicators were normalised and aggregated across exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity to compute provincial CC-JVI scores for two periods: 2001–2011 and 2012–2022. Comparative statistical analyses included the Shapiro–Wilk test for normality, paired-samples t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for temporal change, and Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests for interprovincial differences. Findings indicate marked spatial variation in vulnerability trajectories. KwaZulu-Natal exhibited the greatest variability, consistent with heightened extreme-weather exposure. Mpumalanga showed relative stability alongside a warming trend, while the Eastern Cape stabilised despite rising temperatures. Limpopo maintained a steady warming pattern and emerged as the most at-risk province. Classification results placed Eastern Cape, KwaZulu-Natal, and Mpumalanga as “Moderately vulnerable,” while Limpopo was “Vulnerable.” Normality testing suggested non-normal distributions for KwaZulu-Natal and Eastern Cape during 2001–2011, with improved normality in 2012–2022; Mpumalanga and Limpopo remained approximately normal across both periods. Significant temperature changes were detected for KwaZulu-Natal, Mpumalanga, and Eastern Cape, but not for Limpopo. Interprovincial differences in overall vulnerability were not statistically significant (Kruskal–Wallis χ²(3)=6.047, p=.109). The CC-JVI reveals persistent climatic and socio-economic disparities, supporting customised adaptation planning. Recommendations include strengthening climate data systems, prioritising education and infrastructure investment, mainstreaming adaptation into development plans, promoting provincial collaboration, securing international financing, and conducting periodic CC-JVI reassessments.

Water and Environmental SustainabilityVol. 7(2)
Human Sciences Research Council (ZA)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Climate Change and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Development of a climate change jurisdictional vulnerability index in South Africa — Bernard Moeketsi Hlalele · Water and Environmental Sustainability (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS