Judicial Identification of Labour Relationships in Platform Work in the Digital Economy

The development of the digital economy has reshaped the way labour is organised. Platform-mediated work - food delivery, ride-hailing, live streaming and on-demand freight - has expanded rapidly. Platform enterprises typically present themselves as providers of technical services, information matching or cooperative contracting, yet in practice they shape the labour process through algorithmic dispatching, service ratings, pricing rules, reward and penalty mechanisms and account control. The central judicial question that arises is whether a labour relationship exists between the worker and the platform or its partner enterprise. The traditional identification of labour relationships rests on personal, economic and organisational subordination, but platform work combines formal flexibility with substantive control, which gives rise to inconsistent standards across courts. Taking the notion of ‘dominant labour management’ as its point of departure, this article examines the doctrinal basis, the practical difficulties and the adjudicative approach to identifying labour relationships in platform work. It argues that the digital economy has not altered the essential structure of domination and subordination within the labour relationship; it has merely transformed labour management from direct commands into rule-based, algorithmic and evaluative forms of control. Judicial practice should adhere to a fact-first principle and assess, in combination, the contractual label, the work rules, algorithmic dispatching, the source of remuneration, business integration, the allocation of risk and the parties’ evidential capacity, so as to balance the protection of workers’ rights against the vitality of the platform economy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v10n10.03
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Judicial Identification of Labour Relationships in Platform Work in the Digital Economy

Hanyu Qiao
International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
article

Judicial Identification of Labour Relationships in Platform Work in the Digital Economy

Hanyu Qiao
article en

Abstract

The development of the digital economy has reshaped the way labour is organised. Platform-mediated work - food delivery, ride-hailing, live streaming and on-demand freight - has expanded rapidly. Platform enterprises typically present themselves as providers of technical services, information matching or cooperative contracting, yet in practice they shape the labour process through algorithmic dispatching, service ratings, pricing rules, reward and penalty mechanisms and account control. The central judicial question that arises is whether a labour relationship exists between the worker and the platform or its partner enterprise. The traditional identification of labour relationships rests on personal, economic and organisational subordination, but platform work combines formal flexibility with substantive control, which gives rise to inconsistent standards across courts. Taking the notion of ‘dominant labour management’ as its point of departure, this article examines the doctrinal basis, the practical difficulties and the adjudicative approach to identifying labour relationships in platform work. It argues that the digital economy has not altered the essential structure of domination and subordination within the labour relationship; it has merely transformed labour management from direct commands into rule-based, algorithmic and evaluative forms of control. Judicial practice should adhere to a fact-first principle and assess, in combination, the contractual label, the work rules, algorithmic dispatching, the source of remuneration, business integration, the allocation of risk and the parties’ evidential capacity, so as to balance the protection of workers’ rights against the vitality of the platform economy.

International Journal of Social Sciences and Public AdministrationVol. 10(10)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon