Straight-Lining and Response Quality in the 2024 Indonesian Nutritional Status Survey: Respondent, Household, and Regional Correlates

Knowledge and attitude scales in national health surveys are used to describe how caregivers understand stunting, yet their validity depends on whether respondents consider each item. This study examined straight-lining, giving identical answers to every item of a scale, in the 2024 Indonesian Nutritional Status Survey. A cross-sectional secondary analysis included 273,959 caregivers who answered a 20-item stunting knowledge and attitude scale containing five negatively worded statements, using survey-weighted logistic regression and multilevel models. Straight-lining occurred in 4.6% of caregivers (95% confidence interval 4.4–4.7), ranged from 0.7% to 29.5% across provinces, and in 70.0% of cases consisted of answering “agree” to every statement. It was less common in the wealthiest households (adjusted odds ratio 0.54) and more common where the child had never had a maternal and child health handbook (1.49), where the respondent did not know the mother’s age at pregnancy (2.71), in rural areas (1.23) and in most regions outside Java and Bali. Straight-lining was strongly clustered: 5% of survey clusters contained 55.6% of all straight-liners. Excluding straight-liners barely changed reliability (0.723 versus 0.720). Straight-lining reflects respondent ability and engagement but is concentrated in particular clusters, pointing to fieldwork practice as a target for quality control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Ilmu Psikologi dan Kesehatan (SIKONTAN)
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47353/sikontan.v5i2.5542
Primary Topic
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Straight-Lining and Response Quality in the 2024 Indonesian Nutritional Status Survey: Respondent, Household, and Regional Correlates

Esti Sri Ananingsih, Yunike Yunike, Risa Nur Aulia, Ira Kusumawaty et al.
Jurnal Ilmu Psikologi dan Kesehatan (SIKONTAN)
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
article

Straight-Lining and Response Quality in the 2024 Indonesian Nutritional Status Survey: Respondent, Household, and Regional Correlates

Esti Sri Ananingsih, Yunike Yunike, Risa Nur Aulia, Ira Kusumawaty, Kiki Sulaningsi, Ayu Febri Wulanda
article en

Abstract

Knowledge and attitude scales in national health surveys are used to describe how caregivers understand stunting, yet their validity depends on whether respondents consider each item. This study examined straight-lining, giving identical answers to every item of a scale, in the 2024 Indonesian Nutritional Status Survey. A cross-sectional secondary analysis included 273,959 caregivers who answered a 20-item stunting knowledge and attitude scale containing five negatively worded statements, using survey-weighted logistic regression and multilevel models. Straight-lining occurred in 4.6% of caregivers (95% confidence interval 4.4–4.7), ranged from 0.7% to 29.5% across provinces, and in 70.0% of cases consisted of answering “agree” to every statement. It was less common in the wealthiest households (adjusted odds ratio 0.54) and more common where the child had never had a maternal and child health handbook (1.49), where the respondent did not know the mother’s age at pregnancy (2.71), in rural areas (1.23) and in most regions outside Java and Bali. Straight-lining was strongly clustered: 5% of survey clusters contained 55.6% of all straight-liners. Excluding straight-liners barely changed reliability (0.723 versus 0.720). Straight-lining reflects respondent ability and engagement but is concentrated in particular clusters, pointing to fieldwork practice as a target for quality control.

Jurnal Ilmu Psikologi dan Kesehatan (SIKONTAN)Vol. 5(2)
Politeknik Kesehatan Kementerian Kesehatan Palembang (ID)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon