Predictive value of birth weight and age for preliminary community-level stratification of undernutrition risk among children under 5: a cross-sectional study in rural Indonesia

PURPOSE: We evaluated the predictive value of low birth weight (LBW), child age, and maternal education for stunting, wasting, and underweight among children aged 0-59 months. METHODS: We analyzed cross-sectional surveillance data from 394 children in Pesisir Selatan District, West Sumatra, Indonesia, and classified nutritional status according to the 2006 World Health Organization Child Growth Standards. For each outcome, we fitted a parsimonious logistic model (LBW, age, maternal education, and sex) and an expanded model incorporating 8 additional variables (9 regression coefficients). We assessed discrimination using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and calibration using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration slope. RESULTS: The prevalence of stunting, wasting, and underweight was 14.5%, 10.7%, and 17.3%, respectively. LBW was the strongest predictor in the parsimonious model for stunting (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 4.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.53-9.29), wasting (AOR, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.38-6.02), and underweight (AOR, 4.34; 95% CI, 2.30-8.19; p≤.005). A lack of formal maternal education was independently associated with stunting and underweight. The optimism-corrected AUROCs were .706, .631, and .751, with calibration slopes of .88, .75, and .90, respectively. Adding variables in the expanded model did not improve fit (likelihood-ratio p>.05) and increased optimism. Conclusion: The parsimonious model showed modest discrimination for stunting and underweight. Discrimination for wasting was inadequate. A predictive contribution from the added variables could not be demonstrated with the available number of events. These preliminary findings require external validation before community-level application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child Health Nursing Research
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2026.022
Primary Topic
Child Nutrition and Water Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive value of birth weight and age for preliminary community-level stratification of undernutrition risk among children under 5: a cross-sectional study in rural Indonesia

Rika Sarfika, Tukimin Bin Sansuwito, Rini Rahmayanti, Yani Maidelwita et al.
2 links
Child Health Nursing Research
Child Nutrition and Water Access
article

Predictive value of birth weight and age for preliminary community-level stratification of undernutrition risk among children under 5: a cross-sectional study in rural Indonesia

Rika Sarfika, Tukimin Bin Sansuwito, Rini Rahmayanti, Yani Maidelwita, Sri Suciana
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the predictive value of low birth weight (LBW), child age, and maternal education for stunting, wasting, and underweight among children aged 0-59 months. METHODS: We analyzed cross-sectional surveillance data from 394 children in Pesisir Selatan District, West Sumatra, Indonesia, and classified nutritional status according to the 2006 World Health Organization Child Growth Standards. For each outcome, we fitted a parsimonious logistic model (LBW, age, maternal education, and sex) and an expanded model incorporating 8 additional variables (9 regression coefficients). We assessed discrimination using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and calibration using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration slope. RESULTS: The prevalence of stunting, wasting, and underweight was 14.5%, 10.7%, and 17.3%, respectively. LBW was the strongest predictor in the parsimonious model for stunting (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 4.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.53-9.29), wasting (AOR, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.38-6.02), and underweight (AOR, 4.34; 95% CI, 2.30-8.19; p≤.005). A lack of formal maternal education was independently associated with stunting and underweight. The optimism-corrected AUROCs were .706, .631, and .751, with calibration slopes of .88, .75, and .90, respectively. Adding variables in the expanded model did not improve fit (likelihood-ratio p>.05) and increased optimism. Conclusion: The parsimonious model showed modest discrimination for stunting and underweight. Discrimination for wasting was inadequate. A predictive contribution from the added variables could not be demonstrated with the available number of events. These preliminary findings require external validation before community-level application.

Child Health Nursing ResearchVol. 32(4)
University of Brawijaya (ID), Lincoln University College (MY), Andalas University (ID)
Good health and well-being, Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Child Nutrition and Water Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon