The Axiomatic Theory of Ownership, Distribution and Human Well-Being in AI-Native Economies

This paper develops an axiomatic and institutional framework for examining ownership, distribution, material survival, human well-being, and organizational resilience in AI-native economies. Building upon the ANOA (AI-Native Organizational Architecture) research programme, the study investigates how the expansion of artificial productive capital may alter economic claims, access to essential resources, institutional coordination, and the conditions for sustainable human participation. The analysis distinguishes productive abundance from distributive feasibility, monetary income from effective access to essential goods and services, and computational capabilities from legitimate institutional authority. Particular attention is devoted to centralized, decentralized, and federated organizational arrangements. Through formal propositions, conditional mathematical demonstrations, and illustrative quantitative scenarios, the paper examines the circumstances under which resource pooling, institutional diversification, shared reserves, and coordinated governance may improve material security and economic resilience. The research further considers universal essential services, income guarantees, capital participation, social investment mechanisms, and hybrid distributive architectures, evaluating their potential advantages and limitations under resource, financial, legal, and operational constraints. The central proposition is that technological productivity alone does not guarantee human survival, well-being, or economic autonomy. These outcomes depend on the institutional mechanisms through which productive capacity is translated into enforceable economic rights, accessible resources, and sustainable participation. The paper does not claim the universal superiority of federated organizations or any single distributive model. Instead, it establishes a theoretical framework for comparing institutional arrangements according to explicitly defined feasibility, resilience, and human well-being criteria. This publication constitutes Essay IV of the ANOA research series and is presented as an independent theoretical working paper intended for academic examination and further empirical investigation.