Artificial Intelligence Use in Special Education: Hidden Needs Reflected Through Questions

This study examines the professional needs of special education teachers as reflected in AI-generated responses to a systematically developed set of questions, within the framework of Uses and Gratifications Theory (UGT). Rather than consulting teachers directly, the study analyzes the outputs of six AI-based conversational tools in order to reveal the cognitive, emotional, social, and professional gratifications underlying teacher-AI interactions in special education contexts. The study was conducted using an exploratory and interpretive qualitative research design. Data were collected through document analysis of AI-generated responses to 20 systematically selected questions and analyzed using an inductive analytical approach. The analysis was structured within the theoretical framework of UGT. The findings indicate that teachers' interaction with AI tools reflect not only information-seeking but also efforts to reduce uncertainty, seek ethical validation, achieve emotional relief, alleviate professional isolation, and share responsibility. In addition, the questions primarily focused on inclusive education, behavior management, Individualized Education Program (IEP) processes, and ethical decision-making. The results demonstrate that AI-based digital counseling tools function as sources of emotional and professional support for teachers, alongside their pedagogical role. The study offers implications for incorporating the ethical and pedagogical dimensions of AI into teacher education and in-service support systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kuramsal Eğitimbilim
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1900534
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence Use in Special Education: Hidden Needs Reflected Through Questions

Hilal Gengeç, Bahadır İnan
4 links
Kuramsal Eğitimbilim
Artificial Intelligence in Education
article

Artificial Intelligence Use in Special Education: Hidden Needs Reflected Through Questions

Hilal Gengeç, Bahadır İnan
article en

Abstract

This study examines the professional needs of special education teachers as reflected in AI-generated responses to a systematically developed set of questions, within the framework of Uses and Gratifications Theory (UGT). Rather than consulting teachers directly, the study analyzes the outputs of six AI-based conversational tools in order to reveal the cognitive, emotional, social, and professional gratifications underlying teacher-AI interactions in special education contexts. The study was conducted using an exploratory and interpretive qualitative research design. Data were collected through document analysis of AI-generated responses to 20 systematically selected questions and analyzed using an inductive analytical approach. The analysis was structured within the theoretical framework of UGT. The findings indicate that teachers' interaction with AI tools reflect not only information-seeking but also efforts to reduce uncertainty, seek ethical validation, achieve emotional relief, alleviate professional isolation, and share responsibility. In addition, the questions primarily focused on inclusive education, behavior management, Individualized Education Program (IEP) processes, and ethical decision-making. The results demonstrate that AI-based digital counseling tools function as sources of emotional and professional support for teachers, alongside their pedagogical role. The study offers implications for incorporating the ethical and pedagogical dimensions of AI into teacher education and in-service support systems.

Kuramsal EğitimbilimVol. 19(4)
Yozgat Bozok Üniversitesi (TR), Gaziantep University (TR)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Artificial Intelligence in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon