Decentering globalization: processes, conditions, and worldviews

This article argues that the notion of “globalization” that was popularized after communism’s collapse has become empirically defunct and intellectually indefensible. To decenter globalization, this article argues in favor of revising our understanding of the “global” beyond global modernization or the modernization of the “world.” The article proposes to pluralize the concept and adopt a trinity of terms: “global,” “glocal,” and “local.” This solution differentiates the substantive dimensions implicit in most analyses of the “global.” Each of these terms should be seen as analytically autonomous from the others; taken together, they form a trinity of mutually defined concepts. An overview of these concepts is presented, whereby specific terminology for each distinguishes among the processes signified, the conditions indicated, and the worldviews that express normative endorsement of each concept.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Sociology
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2026.1941732
Primary Topic
Globalization and Cultural Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decentering globalization: processes, conditions, and worldviews

Victor N. Roudometof
Frontiers in Sociology
Globalization and Cultural Identity
article

Decentering globalization: processes, conditions, and worldviews

Victor N. Roudometof
article en

Abstract

This article argues that the notion of “globalization” that was popularized after communism’s collapse has become empirically defunct and intellectually indefensible. To decenter globalization, this article argues in favor of revising our understanding of the “global” beyond global modernization or the modernization of the “world.” The article proposes to pluralize the concept and adopt a trinity of terms: “global,” “glocal,” and “local.” This solution differentiates the substantive dimensions implicit in most analyses of the “global.” Each of these terms should be seen as analytically autonomous from the others; taken together, they form a trinity of mutually defined concepts. An overview of these concepts is presented, whereby specific terminology for each distinguishes among the processes signified, the conditions indicated, and the worldviews that express normative endorsement of each concept.

Frontiers in SociologyVol. 11
University of Cyprus (CY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Globalization and Cultural Identity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon