Short-Term Effects of Myofascial Release With or Without Active Mobility Exercises in Physically Active Men With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Crossover Trial

Myofascial release (MFR) is commonly used to reduce pain and facilitate movement in individuals with low back pain; however, whether adding active mobility exercises provides an incremental short-term benefit remains unclear. This randomized, controlled, three-condition crossover trial compared the acute and 48-h effects of MFR alone, MFR combined with active mobility exercises (MFR+MOB), and a Control condition in physically active men with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Thirty-two participants were enrolled, and 31 completed all experimental conditions and were included in the complete-case analysis. Pain intensity, trunk/posterior-chain flexibility, and bilateral active hip-flexion range of motion were assessed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, 10 min post-intervention, and 48 h. Nonparametric repeated-measures analyses preserved the within-participant structure of the crossover design. Pain reduction differed across conditions at all post-intervention time points (all p < 0.001), with both MFR and MFR+MOB showing greater reductions than Control, whereas MFR and MFR+MOB did not differ at Post-0 (adjusted p = 0.402), Post-10 (p = 0.683), or Post-48h (p = 0.672). Trunk/posterior-chain flexibility improved relative to Control after both active interventions, with no differences between MFR and MFR+MOB. Hip-flexion responses were more heterogeneous and were not consistently superior at 48 h. These findings indicate that a single session of MFR was associated with short-term reductions in pain and changes in mobility-related outcomes, while adding active mobility exercises did not provide a consistent incremental benefit over MFR alone within 48 h.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Preprints.org
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202610.2879.v1
Primary Topic
Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Short-Term Effects of Myofascial Release With or Without Active Mobility Exercises in Physically Active Men With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Crossover Trial

Júlio Guilherme Silva, Frederico de Oliveira Meirelles, Igor Ramathur Telles de Jesus, Alexandre Gonçalves de Meirelles et al.
Preprints.org
Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
preprint

Short-Term Effects of Myofascial Release With or Without Active Mobility Exercises in Physically Active Men With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Crossover Trial

Júlio Guilherme Silva, Frederico de Oliveira Meirelles, Igor Ramathur Telles de Jesus, Alexandre Gonçalves de Meirelles, Lavínia Martins Aguilera, Júlio César de Oliveira Muniz Cunha, Jefferson da Silva Novaes, José Vilaça‐Alves, Estêvão Rios Monteiro, Fabiana Pinto Sardinha, Rony Wellington Corrêa Pessoa
preprint en

Abstract

Myofascial release (MFR) is commonly used to reduce pain and facilitate movement in individuals with low back pain; however, whether adding active mobility exercises provides an incremental short-term benefit remains unclear. This randomized, controlled, three-condition crossover trial compared the acute and 48-h effects of MFR alone, MFR combined with active mobility exercises (MFR+MOB), and a Control condition in physically active men with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Thirty-two participants were enrolled, and 31 completed all experimental conditions and were included in the complete-case analysis. Pain intensity, trunk/posterior-chain flexibility, and bilateral active hip-flexion range of motion were assessed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, 10 min post-intervention, and 48 h. Nonparametric repeated-measures analyses preserved the within-participant structure of the crossover design. Pain reduction differed across conditions at all post-intervention time points (all p < 0.001), with both MFR and MFR+MOB showing greater reductions than Control, whereas MFR and MFR+MOB did not differ at Post-0 (adjusted p = 0.402), Post-10 (p = 0.683), or Post-48h (p = 0.672). Trunk/posterior-chain flexibility improved relative to Control after both active interventions, with no differences between MFR and MFR+MOB. Hip-flexion responses were more heterogeneous and were not consistently superior at 48 h. These findings indicate that a single session of MFR was associated with short-term reductions in pain and changes in mobility-related outcomes, while adding active mobility exercises did not provide a consistent incremental benefit over MFR alone within 48 h.

Preprints.org
Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon