Multi-modal data Integration for Metastatic Risk Prediction of AJCC Stage I/II Melanomas: Results from the Population-based Dutch Early-stage Melanoma Study (D-ESMEL)

Early-stage melanoma accounts for 40-60% of melanoma-related deaths. Most prognostic modelling studies focus on unimodal approaches or a single multimodal integration strategy, overlooking alternative methods and biological processes underlying metastatic progression. We aimed to evaluate multi-modal data integration for predicting metastasis using the Dutch Early-Stage Melanoma (D-ESMEL) study, the world's largest multi-modal cohort of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage I/II melanoma. We analysed clinicopathological, genomic, transcriptomic, and pathomics data from the D-ESMEL study. The discovery set included 221 case-control sets matched on follow-up time, age, sex, Breslow thickness, and ulceration. The validation cohort included 154 AJCC stage matched case-control sets based on a population of >5,500 stage I/II melanoma patients. We evaluated four integration strategies (early, intermediate, mixed, and late) using a repeated (n=5) nested 3-fold cross-validation in the discovery set. The best-performing models were evaluated in the validation cohort using the odds ratios (ORs) and a weighted C-index reflecting performance in the sampled population. In the discovery set, intermediate integration of genomics and transcriptomics achieved the highest balanced accuracy (mean: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.57-0.66). Early and late integration of transcriptomics and pathomics, and the unimodal transcriptomics model showed similar performance (mean: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.58-0.65). In the validation cohort both early integration, late integration, and the unimodal transcriptomics model achieved the highest balanced accuracy of 0.60. When adjusted for clinicopathological risk factors early integration remained an independent prognostic factor for metastasis (OR 1.75; p<0.01), outperforming transcriptomics alone (OR 1.26; p<0.01). Early integration reached a weighted C-index of 0.83 outperforming AJCC stage (0.81 C-index). When combined the population-weighted C-index was significantly improved to 0.85 (p<0.01). Early integration of transcriptomics and pathomics outperformed all unimodal models and improved prediction of distant metastasis independently of AJCC stage. Understanding the biological mechanisms underlying these predictions may further support clinical decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
medRxiv
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.26366608
Primary Topic
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Type
preprint

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Multi-modal data Integration for Metastatic Risk Prediction of AJCC Stage I/II Melanomas: Results from the Population-based Dutch Early-stage Melanoma Study (D-ESMEL)

Marcel J. T. Reinders, Jasper Ouwerkerk, Antien L. Mooyaart, Loes M. Hollestein et al.
2 links
medRxiv
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
preprint

Multi-modal data Integration for Metastatic Risk Prediction of AJCC Stage I/II Melanomas: Results from the Population-based Dutch Early-stage Melanoma Study (D-ESMEL)

Marcel J. T. Reinders, Jasper Ouwerkerk, Antien L. Mooyaart, Loes M. Hollestein, Thamila Kerkour, Catherine Zhou, Yunlei Li, Andrew Stubbs
preprint en

Abstract

Early-stage melanoma accounts for 40-60% of melanoma-related deaths. Most prognostic modelling studies focus on unimodal approaches or a single multimodal integration strategy, overlooking alternative methods and biological processes underlying metastatic progression. We aimed to evaluate multi-modal data integration for predicting metastasis using the Dutch Early-Stage Melanoma (D-ESMEL) study, the world's largest multi-modal cohort of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage I/II melanoma. We analysed clinicopathological, genomic, transcriptomic, and pathomics data from the D-ESMEL study. The discovery set included 221 case-control sets matched on follow-up time, age, sex, Breslow thickness, and ulceration. The validation cohort included 154 AJCC stage matched case-control sets based on a population of >5,500 stage I/II melanoma patients. We evaluated four integration strategies (early, intermediate, mixed, and late) using a repeated (n=5) nested 3-fold cross-validation in the discovery set. The best-performing models were evaluated in the validation cohort using the odds ratios (ORs) and a weighted C-index reflecting performance in the sampled population. In the discovery set, intermediate integration of genomics and transcriptomics achieved the highest balanced accuracy (mean: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.57-0.66). Early and late integration of transcriptomics and pathomics, and the unimodal transcriptomics model showed similar performance (mean: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.58-0.65). In the validation cohort both early integration, late integration, and the unimodal transcriptomics model achieved the highest balanced accuracy of 0.60. When adjusted for clinicopathological risk factors early integration remained an independent prognostic factor for metastasis (OR 1.75; p<0.01), outperforming transcriptomics alone (OR 1.26; p<0.01). Early integration reached a weighted C-index of 0.83 outperforming AJCC stage (0.81 C-index). When combined the population-weighted C-index was significantly improved to 0.85 (p<0.01). Early integration of transcriptomics and pathomics outperformed all unimodal models and improved prediction of distant metastasis independently of AJCC stage. Understanding the biological mechanisms underlying these predictions may further support clinical decision-making.

medRxiv
Erasmus MC (NL), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
KWF Kankerbestrijding
Good health and well-being
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon