Confidential Computing with Trusted Execution Environments: Architectures, Attacks and Applications

Encryption protects data on disk and on the network. A program must still decrypt its data to compute on it, and at that moment whoever runs the machine can read it. Confidential computing tries to close this gap with hardware. A trusted execution environment isolates code and data from the operating system, the hypervisor and the operator, and remote attestation lets a distant party check what was loaded. This article reviews the published research on that idea. We describe the two designs now in use, process-level enclaves and confidential virtual machines, with the hardware families behind them. We then go through what attestation proves, what it costs to run unmodified software in an enclave, and the attack literature grouped by class: transient execution, controlled channels and interrupts, fault injection, weaknesses in memory encryption, and abuse of the host interface. Applications to machine learning follow, with a short comparison against homomorphic encryption. This is a review and no new experiment is reported. Our reading is that the trust model is narrower than the name suggests.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Information Technology Research Studies (IJITRS)
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63090/ijitrs/3139.3209.0036
Primary Topic
Security and Verification in Computing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Confidential Computing with Trusted Execution Environments: Architectures, Attacks and Applications

Win Mathew John
3 links
International Journal of Information Technology Research Studies (IJITRS)
Security and Verification in Computing
article

Confidential Computing with Trusted Execution Environments: Architectures, Attacks and Applications

Win Mathew John
article en

Abstract

Encryption protects data on disk and on the network. A program must still decrypt its data to compute on it, and at that moment whoever runs the machine can read it. Confidential computing tries to close this gap with hardware. A trusted execution environment isolates code and data from the operating system, the hypervisor and the operator, and remote attestation lets a distant party check what was loaded. This article reviews the published research on that idea. We describe the two designs now in use, process-level enclaves and confidential virtual machines, with the hardware families behind them. We then go through what attestation proves, what it costs to run unmodified software in an enclave, and the attack literature grouped by class: transient execution, controlled channels and interrupts, fault injection, weaknesses in memory encryption, and abuse of the host interface. Applications to machine learning follow, with a short comparison against homomorphic encryption. This is a review and no new experiment is reported. Our reading is that the trust model is narrower than the name suggests.

International Journal of Information Technology Research Studies (IJITRS)Vol. 2(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Security and Verification in Computing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon