Mapping sustainability reporting using indicator attributes

Purpose This study aims to examine how the attributes of reported sustainability indicators can be used to infer the reporting strategies organisations adopt. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on institutional, stakeholder and legitimacy theories, we reviewed the sustainability reporting literature to identify key reporting strategies and related indicator attributes, including reporting frequency, stakeholder focus and the direction and sensitivity of information. These attributes informed a global reporting initiative (GRI)-based coding framework, which we applied to 2,184 GRI-based sustainability reports from 364 US-listed firms in the Forbes Global 2000 between 2018 and 2023. Frequency data were analysed quantitatively, while the remaining attributes were independently coded and mapped to GRI performance indicators. Descriptive trend analysis, comparative distribution analysis and regression models were then used to examine how disclosure profiles differed across reporting groups and evolved over time. The framework was subsequently applied across the sample to identify and compare firms’ reporting strategies. Findings Indicator attributes reveal strategic differences not visible from disclosure counts alone. Firms with similar disclosure volumes may allocate reporting attention very differently across indicators, stakeholders and disclosure types, while firms with differing disclosure volumes may exhibit similar reporting profiles. The findings show that increases in disclosure volume do not necessarily correspond to broader disclosure coverage or more inclusive reporting strategies. Although reporting levels generally increased over time, disclosure profiles changed only modestly, with firms largely maintaining similar reporting orientations across the study period. A firm’s reporting approach may also appear broader under one theoretical lens but selective or concentrated under another, highlighting the importance of using multiple perspectives when assessing sustainability disclosure strategies. Originality/value The study shows the value of examining sustainability reports through multiple theoretical perspectives and introduces a structured, theory-informed approach for analysing reporting content.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jaoc-12-2025-0565
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping sustainability reporting using indicator attributes

Ramona Zharfpeykan, Paul Rouse
2 links
Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Mapping sustainability reporting using indicator attributes

Ramona Zharfpeykan, Paul Rouse
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine how the attributes of reported sustainability indicators can be used to infer the reporting strategies organisations adopt. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on institutional, stakeholder and legitimacy theories, we reviewed the sustainability reporting literature to identify key reporting strategies and related indicator attributes, including reporting frequency, stakeholder focus and the direction and sensitivity of information. These attributes informed a global reporting initiative (GRI)-based coding framework, which we applied to 2,184 GRI-based sustainability reports from 364 US-listed firms in the Forbes Global 2000 between 2018 and 2023. Frequency data were analysed quantitatively, while the remaining attributes were independently coded and mapped to GRI performance indicators. Descriptive trend analysis, comparative distribution analysis and regression models were then used to examine how disclosure profiles differed across reporting groups and evolved over time. The framework was subsequently applied across the sample to identify and compare firms’ reporting strategies. Findings Indicator attributes reveal strategic differences not visible from disclosure counts alone. Firms with similar disclosure volumes may allocate reporting attention very differently across indicators, stakeholders and disclosure types, while firms with differing disclosure volumes may exhibit similar reporting profiles. The findings show that increases in disclosure volume do not necessarily correspond to broader disclosure coverage or more inclusive reporting strategies. Although reporting levels generally increased over time, disclosure profiles changed only modestly, with firms largely maintaining similar reporting orientations across the study period. A firm’s reporting approach may also appear broader under one theoretical lens but selective or concentrated under another, highlighting the importance of using multiple perspectives when assessing sustainability disclosure strategies. Originality/value The study shows the value of examining sustainability reports through multiple theoretical perspectives and introduces a structured, theory-informed approach for analysing reporting content.

Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change
University of Auckland (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon