Pediatrician attitudes, acceptance, and concerns regarding artificial intelligence in pediatric care: a web-based survey in Türkiye

In Türkiye, pediatricians’ perspectives on artificial intelligence (AI), including their knowledge, trust, and concerns, remain underexplored. This study aims to evaluate pediatricians’ knowledge, perceptions, and acceptance of AI in pediatric care. A cross-sectional, open, web-based convenience survey was conducted among pediatricians in Türkiye, including residents and specialists. The survey assessed their knowledge of AI, perceptions of its benefits and risks, and acceptance of AI as a clinical decision support tool. A total of 403 pediatricians accessed the survey; 18 declined to participate, 1 was excluded for a completion time under two minutes, and 16 were excluded for an inconsistent control-item. After excluding responses, 368 were included in the analysis. Participants had a median age of 35 years and a median of 9 years of pediatric care experience. Only 9.5% of participants reported awareness of AI in pediatrics, and 85.9% rated their self-perceived AI knowledge as average or below. Despite this, 74.2% agreed that AI will improve pediatrics, and 88.3% stated it could enhance care quality. Concerns included legal liability (78.5%), data security (54.6%), and the black-box nature of AI (59.2%). Across all 37 ordinal items, a single age correlation survived: younger respondents were more likely to expect AI to increase diagnostic confidence (r s = -0.171, 95% CI -0.269 to -0.070, small effect size; P = 0.001; P adj = 0.038). While 90.8% supported AI as a clinical decision support tool, only 17.4% believed AI could replace human physicians in non-invasive roles. Only 19.3% expected their institution to allocate financial or personnel resources for AI integration. Survey respondents generally view AI as a promising tool to improve pediatric care but express significant concerns about its reliability, ethical implications, and legal responsibilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pediatrics
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-026-07966-1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pediatrician attitudes, acceptance, and concerns regarding artificial intelligence in pediatric care: a web-based survey in Türkiye

Nida Dinçel, Nilgün Harputluoğlu, Cagla Ozbakir, Derşan Onur
6 links
BMC Pediatrics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Pediatrician attitudes, acceptance, and concerns regarding artificial intelligence in pediatric care: a web-based survey in Türkiye

Nida Dinçel, Nilgün Harputluoğlu, Cagla Ozbakir, Derşan Onur
article en

Abstract

In Türkiye, pediatricians’ perspectives on artificial intelligence (AI), including their knowledge, trust, and concerns, remain underexplored. This study aims to evaluate pediatricians’ knowledge, perceptions, and acceptance of AI in pediatric care. A cross-sectional, open, web-based convenience survey was conducted among pediatricians in Türkiye, including residents and specialists. The survey assessed their knowledge of AI, perceptions of its benefits and risks, and acceptance of AI as a clinical decision support tool. A total of 403 pediatricians accessed the survey; 18 declined to participate, 1 was excluded for a completion time under two minutes, and 16 were excluded for an inconsistent control-item. After excluding responses, 368 were included in the analysis. Participants had a median age of 35 years and a median of 9 years of pediatric care experience. Only 9.5% of participants reported awareness of AI in pediatrics, and 85.9% rated their self-perceived AI knowledge as average or below. Despite this, 74.2% agreed that AI will improve pediatrics, and 88.3% stated it could enhance care quality. Concerns included legal liability (78.5%), data security (54.6%), and the black-box nature of AI (59.2%). Across all 37 ordinal items, a single age correlation survived: younger respondents were more likely to expect AI to increase diagnostic confidence (r s = -0.171, 95% CI -0.269 to -0.070, small effect size; P = 0.001; P adj = 0.038). While 90.8% supported AI as a clinical decision support tool, only 17.4% believed AI could replace human physicians in non-invasive roles. Only 19.3% expected their institution to allocate financial or personnel resources for AI integration. Survey respondents generally view AI as a promising tool to improve pediatric care but express significant concerns about its reliability, ethical implications, and legal responsibilities.

BMC Pediatrics
Dr. Behçet Uz Çocuk Hastalıkları Hastanesi (TR), Izmir Tepecik Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon