Automated insulin delivery in older adults with type 1 diabetes: evidence, limitations, and clinical perspectives

Abstract Objective Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have significantly improved the management of type 1 diabetes (T1D), leading to better glycemic control and reduced hypoglycemia. However, older adults (≥ 65 years) remain underrepresented in clinical trials, and evidence specific to this population is limited. Design and patients This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the efficacy, safety, and usability of AID systems in older adults (≥ 65 years) with T1D. A comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE/PubMed was conducted using the PICO framework to identify relevant RCTs, observational studies, and systematic reviews, supplemented by literature studies on cognitive, functional, and psychosocial factors impacting technology adoption. Results While data from randomized trials and meta-analyses in the general population consistently demonstrate improvements in time in range (TIR, 70–180 mg/dL) and reductions in hypoglycemia, evidence in older adults is still emerging. Frail individuals and those with multiple comorbidities are often underrepresented or excluded from current studies. Nevertheless, the available evidence suggests that many of these benefits are also maintained in older populations, particularly regarding hypoglycemia reduction. At the same time, factors such as cognitive impairment, functional limitations, caregiver dependence, and reduced digital literacy may affect the adoption and effective use of these technologies. Conclusions AID systems appear effective and generally safe in selected older adults, with benefits in glycemic control and hypoglycemia reduction. However, given the marked heterogeneity of this population, further studies are needed to better define their role and applicability in routine clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Endocrine
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-026-04816-z
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automated insulin delivery in older adults with type 1 diabetes: evidence, limitations, and clinical perspectives

Tommaso Piticchio, Rosario Le Moli, Andrea Tumminia, Sabrina Scilletta et al.
Endocrine
Diabetes Management and Research
article

Automated insulin delivery in older adults with type 1 diabetes: evidence, limitations, and clinical perspectives

Tommaso Piticchio, Rosario Le Moli, Andrea Tumminia, Sabrina Scilletta, Vittorio Oteri, Filippo Luca Fimognari, Maurizio Di Marco, Francesco Frasca, Antonino Di Pino, Rossella Cannarella, Giuseppe Papa, Francesco Galeano, Agnese Rita Catena Mobilia
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have significantly improved the management of type 1 diabetes (T1D), leading to better glycemic control and reduced hypoglycemia. However, older adults (≥ 65 years) remain underrepresented in clinical trials, and evidence specific to this population is limited. Design and patients This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the efficacy, safety, and usability of AID systems in older adults (≥ 65 years) with T1D. A comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE/PubMed was conducted using the PICO framework to identify relevant RCTs, observational studies, and systematic reviews, supplemented by literature studies on cognitive, functional, and psychosocial factors impacting technology adoption. Results While data from randomized trials and meta-analyses in the general population consistently demonstrate improvements in time in range (TIR, 70–180 mg/dL) and reductions in hypoglycemia, evidence in older adults is still emerging. Frail individuals and those with multiple comorbidities are often underrepresented or excluded from current studies. Nevertheless, the available evidence suggests that many of these benefits are also maintained in older populations, particularly regarding hypoglycemia reduction. At the same time, factors such as cognitive impairment, functional limitations, caregiver dependence, and reduced digital literacy may affect the adoption and effective use of these technologies. Conclusions AID systems appear effective and generally safe in selected older adults, with benefits in glycemic control and hypoglycemia reduction. However, given the marked heterogeneity of this population, further studies are needed to better define their role and applicability in routine clinical practice.

EndocrineVol. 91(1)
Università degli Studi di Enna Kore (IT), University of Catania (IT), Ospedale Garibaldi (IT), Ospedale Annunziata di Cosenza (IT), Ospedale Cannizzaro (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Diabetes Management and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon