Another Empty Promise of Grade Retention? Peer Effects of Classmate Retention

Grade retention is a common but costly educational practice and studies have repeatedly shown that, in many contexts, it offers no academic benefit to retained students. A remaining justification for its continued use is the presumed benefit for the promoted peers from whose class the retained student was removed. This study tests that assumption using longitudinal data from the German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) and a difference-in-differences approach, focusing on grades and competencies from Grades 1 to 9. Results predominantly yield null findings, with a small positive effect on mathematics grades in lower secondary education (0.08–0.09 SD) as the only exception. Overall, our findings do not provide support for presumed peer benefits as a justification for grade retention.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/thqm9_v1
Primary Topic
School Choice and Performance
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Another Empty Promise of Grade Retention? Peer Effects of Classmate Retention

Fabian T. Pfeffer, Samuel Jalalian
School Choice and Performance
preprint

Another Empty Promise of Grade Retention? Peer Effects of Classmate Retention

Fabian T. Pfeffer, Samuel Jalalian
preprint en

Abstract

Grade retention is a common but costly educational practice and studies have repeatedly shown that, in many contexts, it offers no academic benefit to retained students. A remaining justification for its continued use is the presumed benefit for the promoted peers from whose class the retained student was removed. This study tests that assumption using longitudinal data from the German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) and a difference-in-differences approach, focusing on grades and competencies from Grades 1 to 9. Results predominantly yield null findings, with a small positive effect on mathematics grades in lower secondary education (0.08–0.09 SD) as the only exception. Overall, our findings do not provide support for presumed peer benefits as a justification for grade retention.

Quality education
School Choice and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon