Perceived Sources Matter: Implications of Misinformation on Media Trust and News Avoidance Under Different Levels of Press Freedom

Extant research on the impact of misinformation on media trust and news avoidance behavior has produced competing arguments and findings. The present study argues that the relationships among misinformation, media trust, and news avoidance can be better specified by considering whether people perceive misinformation as coming primarily from established institutions or non-institutional sources. Given the close linkage between the mainstream news media and established social and political institutions, people are likely to exhibit lower levels of news trust and higher levels of news avoidance if they perceive misinformation as coming from institutional sources. In contrast, when people perceive misinformation as coming from non-institutional sources, they may rely on the news media as authoritative fact-checkers and hence trust the news more and avoid it less. Societal-level press freedom is likely to moderate such relationships. The arguments and hypotheses are tested by an analysis of Digital News Report 2025 data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990261495859
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceived Sources Matter: Implications of Misinformation on Media Trust and News Avoidance Under Different Levels of Press Freedom

Francis Lap Fung Lee, Michael Chan, Yuteng Zheng
2 links
Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Perceived Sources Matter: Implications of Misinformation on Media Trust and News Avoidance Under Different Levels of Press Freedom

Francis Lap Fung Lee, Michael Chan, Yuteng Zheng
article en

Abstract

Extant research on the impact of misinformation on media trust and news avoidance behavior has produced competing arguments and findings. The present study argues that the relationships among misinformation, media trust, and news avoidance can be better specified by considering whether people perceive misinformation as coming primarily from established institutions or non-institutional sources. Given the close linkage between the mainstream news media and established social and political institutions, people are likely to exhibit lower levels of news trust and higher levels of news avoidance if they perceive misinformation as coming from institutional sources. In contrast, when people perceive misinformation as coming from non-institutional sources, they may rely on the news media as authoritative fact-checkers and hence trust the news more and avoid it less. Societal-level press freedom is likely to moderate such relationships. The arguments and hypotheses are tested by an analysis of Digital News Report 2025 data.

Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon