Digitalization and Cybersecurity: Firm‐level Evidence

Abstract Digitalization has opposing effects on cybersecurity: While new digital technologies can strengthen security capabilities, they simultaneously expand potential attack surfaces. To determine which effect dominates, we analyse 9606 US firm‐years (2006–2023) with 543 documented breaches and find that increased digitalization, measured through 10‐K business descriptions, significantly raises the likelihood of future cyber breaches. A one‐standard‐deviation increase in digitalization corresponds to up to a 10 percentage point higher breach probability, driven primarily by organizational rather than technological dimensions. Expert auditors and cybersecurity disclosure reduce breach likelihood, but their protective effect attenuates as digitalization rises; that of board and C‐suite technology expertise instead strengthens. These findings qualify the protective role of conventional monitoring in highly digitalized firms and point to a repositioning of cybersecurity governance from external monitoring towards digital expertise embedded in strategic decision‐making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Management
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.70119
Primary Topic
Information and Cyber Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digitalization and Cybersecurity: Firm‐level Evidence

Jukka Sihvonen
1 links
British Journal of Management
Information and Cyber Security
article

Digitalization and Cybersecurity: Firm‐level Evidence

Jukka Sihvonen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Digitalization has opposing effects on cybersecurity: While new digital technologies can strengthen security capabilities, they simultaneously expand potential attack surfaces. To determine which effect dominates, we analyse 9606 US firm‐years (2006–2023) with 543 documented breaches and find that increased digitalization, measured through 10‐K business descriptions, significantly raises the likelihood of future cyber breaches. A one‐standard‐deviation increase in digitalization corresponds to up to a 10 percentage point higher breach probability, driven primarily by organizational rather than technological dimensions. Expert auditors and cybersecurity disclosure reduce breach likelihood, but their protective effect attenuates as digitalization rises; that of board and C‐suite technology expertise instead strengthens. These findings qualify the protective role of conventional monitoring in highly digitalized firms and point to a repositioning of cybersecurity governance from external monitoring towards digital expertise embedded in strategic decision‐making.

British Journal of Management
University of Vaasa (FI)
Aalto-Yliopisto, University of Surrey
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Information and Cyber Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon