Prioritizing Benefit? How Low-Income Patients Respond to Prescription Cost Sharing

This paper measures how cost sharing impacts older low-income patients, exploiting a discontinuity in eligibility for a prescription drug subsidy for those who lose access to the Medicaid-linked program. Higher drug prices resulting from subsidy loss lead to a 40 percent reduction in prescription expenditures, driven by a 16 percent quantity reduction of prescriptions filled. Patients economize on purchases of higher-priced drugs, irrespective of their health benefits. For example, patients reduce insulin purchases by 35 percent. There is no evidence that cost sharing prompts switching from branded drugs to generics. This behavior suggests that cost sharing reduces prescription accessibility without enhancing cost-effectiveness. (JEL D24, I11, I18, I32, I38, L65)

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
American Economic Journal Economic Policy
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20240814
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prioritizing Benefit? How Low-Income Patients Respond to Prescription Cost Sharing

Christopher Hollrah
American Economic Journal Economic Policy
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
article

Prioritizing Benefit? How Low-Income Patients Respond to Prescription Cost Sharing

Christopher Hollrah
article en

Abstract

This paper measures how cost sharing impacts older low-income patients, exploiting a discontinuity in eligibility for a prescription drug subsidy for those who lose access to the Medicaid-linked program. Higher drug prices resulting from subsidy loss lead to a 40 percent reduction in prescription expenditures, driven by a 16 percent quantity reduction of prescriptions filled. Patients economize on purchases of higher-priced drugs, irrespective of their health benefits. For example, patients reduce insulin purchases by 35 percent. There is no evidence that cost sharing prompts switching from branded drugs to generics. This behavior suggests that cost sharing reduces prescription accessibility without enhancing cost-effectiveness. (JEL D24, I11, I18, I32, I38, L65)

American Economic Journal Economic PolicyVol. 18(4)
Reduced inequalities, Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon