Lexical Diversity and Sophistication in State Accountability Testing: A Corpus-Based Investigation

High-stakes, state-level accountability assessments play a central role in U.S. educational accountability systems, shaping instructional priorities and influencing opportunities for many students. Despite their significance, relatively little is known about the linguistic complexity of these assessments, particularly in light of natural language processing (NLP) tools that allow systematic analysis of lexical demands. To increase our understanding of the language features and demands of state accountability assessment, the present study conducts a corpus-based analysis of lexical diversity and sophistication in a large-scale state accountability assessment across five subjects (Reading, Math, Science, Writing, and Social Studies) and Grades 3 through 8. Specifically, using two NLP tools, the study examined how lexical diversity and sophistication features vary across disciplines and grades. Results from ANOVAs revealed systematic variation across subjects and grade levels. The findings provide a comprehensive lexical landscape, revealing the uneven distribution of lexical density, diversity, and sophistication across academic disciplines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Assessment
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2026.2749626
Primary Topic
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lexical Diversity and Sophistication in State Accountability Testing: A Corpus-Based Investigation

Amin Raeisi‐Vanani, Li‐Jen Kuo, Héctor H. Rivera, Heesun Chang
1 links
Educational Assessment
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
article

Lexical Diversity and Sophistication in State Accountability Testing: A Corpus-Based Investigation

Amin Raeisi‐Vanani, Li‐Jen Kuo, Héctor H. Rivera, Heesun Chang
article en

Abstract

High-stakes, state-level accountability assessments play a central role in U.S. educational accountability systems, shaping instructional priorities and influencing opportunities for many students. Despite their significance, relatively little is known about the linguistic complexity of these assessments, particularly in light of natural language processing (NLP) tools that allow systematic analysis of lexical demands. To increase our understanding of the language features and demands of state accountability assessment, the present study conducts a corpus-based analysis of lexical diversity and sophistication in a large-scale state accountability assessment across five subjects (Reading, Math, Science, Writing, and Social Studies) and Grades 3 through 8. Specifically, using two NLP tools, the study examined how lexical diversity and sophistication features vary across disciplines and grades. Results from ANOVAs revealed systematic variation across subjects and grade levels. The findings provide a comprehensive lexical landscape, revealing the uneven distribution of lexical density, diversity, and sophistication across academic disciplines.

Educational Assessment
Texas A&M University (US)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon