Economic balancing as a mechanism for stability: Insights from the China–Iran–Saudi Arabia triad

This study proposes economic balancing as a mechanism that may facilitate systemic stability in asymmetric geopolitical configurations. Extending Heider’s balance theory to international political economy and drawing on network-based models, it examines how economic interdependence with a pivotal third party may moderate tensions in structurally unbalanced state triads. Using the China–Iran–Saudi Arabia triad as an illustrative case, we introduce two analytical instruments, the economic balancing coefficient and the stability–interest matrix, to describe how economic linkages relate to political tensions within and across dyads. The results support the proposition that China’s substantial economic ties with both states, set against minimal direct Iran–Saudi Arabia ties, created structural conditions favourable to the 2023 détente. The single-case design does not establish causation, since security-driven factors also shape the rapprochement. This study therefore suggests that asymmetric economic interdependence may facilitate, rather than guarantee, accommodation between adversaries, qualifying the neorealist claim that power parity is a prerequisite for stability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economic and Political Studies
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/20954816.2026.2751231
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Economic balancing as a mechanism for stability: Insights from the China–Iran–Saudi Arabia triad

Li Sheng, Asad Ullah
Economic and Political Studies
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

Economic balancing as a mechanism for stability: Insights from the China–Iran–Saudi Arabia triad

Li Sheng, Asad Ullah
article en

Abstract

This study proposes economic balancing as a mechanism that may facilitate systemic stability in asymmetric geopolitical configurations. Extending Heider’s balance theory to international political economy and drawing on network-based models, it examines how economic interdependence with a pivotal third party may moderate tensions in structurally unbalanced state triads. Using the China–Iran–Saudi Arabia triad as an illustrative case, we introduce two analytical instruments, the economic balancing coefficient and the stability–interest matrix, to describe how economic linkages relate to political tensions within and across dyads. The results support the proposition that China’s substantial economic ties with both states, set against minimal direct Iran–Saudi Arabia ties, created structural conditions favourable to the 2023 détente. The single-case design does not establish causation, since security-driven factors also shape the rapprochement. This study therefore suggests that asymmetric economic interdependence may facilitate, rather than guarantee, accommodation between adversaries, qualifying the neorealist claim that power parity is a prerequisite for stability.

Economic and Political Studies
Shandong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon