From Course Design to Student Experience: Student Perceptions of Quality in Online Learning

Introduction While formal design standards and evaluation frameworks assess online course quality, they may not fully capture students’ lived experiences of course design. Student perceptions are therefore an important complement to structural evaluation. This study examined students’ perceptions of selected Quality Matters (QM)-aligned design practices and their relationships with belonging, instructor caring, satisfaction, technological barriers, and performance.Methods Undergraduate students enrolled in online courses at a Research 1 U.S. institution were surveyed during the 2023–2024 academic year, yielding 859 responses across 256 courses. Twenty-three items adapted from the QM Higher Education Rubric assessed students’ perceived course quality. Descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U tests using a cutoff adapted from the QM certification threshold, and multiple regression analyses were conducted to examine relationships between student perceptions of course quality and outcomes.Results Students generally perceived course quality practices as present; however, perceptions varied across different course design dimensions, with structural and organizational practices reported most consistently. Across analyses, greater perceived presence of QM-aligned design practices was associated with higher levels of instructor caring, satisfaction, and belonging, along with fewer perceived barriers and slightly higher grades. Although structural and organizational practices were reported as the most prevalent QM-aligned practices, the strongest relationships with outcomes were observed for practices related to assessment, instructional materials, and learning activities and interaction.Discussion The findings suggest that examination of online course quality should move beyond verifying whether design features are present to considering how students experience these features as they progress through a course.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Distance Education
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2026.2747519
Primary Topic
Online and Blended Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Course Design to Student Experience: Student Perceptions of Quality in Online Learning

Rabia Yalcinkaya, Dan Spencer, Bethanne Winzeler, Caranda J. Shubrick
American Journal of Distance Education
Online and Blended Learning
article

From Course Design to Student Experience: Student Perceptions of Quality in Online Learning

Rabia Yalcinkaya, Dan Spencer, Bethanne Winzeler, Caranda J. Shubrick
article en

Abstract

Introduction While formal design standards and evaluation frameworks assess online course quality, they may not fully capture students’ lived experiences of course design. Student perceptions are therefore an important complement to structural evaluation. This study examined students’ perceptions of selected Quality Matters (QM)-aligned design practices and their relationships with belonging, instructor caring, satisfaction, technological barriers, and performance.Methods Undergraduate students enrolled in online courses at a Research 1 U.S. institution were surveyed during the 2023–2024 academic year, yielding 859 responses across 256 courses. Twenty-three items adapted from the QM Higher Education Rubric assessed students’ perceived course quality. Descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U tests using a cutoff adapted from the QM certification threshold, and multiple regression analyses were conducted to examine relationships between student perceptions of course quality and outcomes.Results Students generally perceived course quality practices as present; however, perceptions varied across different course design dimensions, with structural and organizational practices reported most consistently. Across analyses, greater perceived presence of QM-aligned design practices was associated with higher levels of instructor caring, satisfaction, and belonging, along with fewer perceived barriers and slightly higher grades. Although structural and organizational practices were reported as the most prevalent QM-aligned practices, the strongest relationships with outcomes were observed for practices related to assessment, instructional materials, and learning activities and interaction.Discussion The findings suggest that examination of online course quality should move beyond verifying whether design features are present to considering how students experience these features as they progress through a course.

American Journal of Distance Education
North Carolina State University (US)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Online and Blended Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon