GNN's for financial fraud detection

Financial fraud, including stolen-card use, identity theft, fake loan applications, and organised group fraud, causes large economic losses and weakens trust in digital financial services. Detectors that score each transaction or customer independently miss the relationships through which fraudsters operate: shared phone numbers, addresses, devices, and coordinated activity. Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) address this limitation by representing customers, accounts, or transactions as graph nodes and learning from both their features and their connections, which turns fraud detection into node classification. This paper reviews the fundamentals, architectures, and limitations of GNN-based fraud detection and critically analyses four recent studies: GraphFA (industrial loan fraud with edge-level camouflage detection), a GCN/GAT/RGCN study on credit-card transactions, FFDM-GNN (IEEE-CIS data), and the proposed real-time Autonomous GNN (AGNN). The strength of evidence differs sharply. GraphFA is supported by a large real dataset, gradient-boosting baselines, and an ablation study, whereas the other studies show probable data leakage after oversampling, conclusions that contradict their own tables, or performance claims without experimental detail. A conceptual framework is outlined that combines leakage-safe data preparation, justified graph construction, camouflage-aware edge filtering, an imbalance-aware relational GNN, strong baselines with honest metrics, and explainability with monitoring. The study is literature-based; the framework has not been implemented or tested

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23752464
Primary Topic
Advanced Graph Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GNN's for financial fraud detection

Saurabh Bhapkar
6 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced Graph Neural Networks
article

GNN's for financial fraud detection

Saurabh Bhapkar
article en

Abstract

Financial fraud, including stolen-card use, identity theft, fake loan applications, and organised group fraud, causes large economic losses and weakens trust in digital financial services. Detectors that score each transaction or customer independently miss the relationships through which fraudsters operate: shared phone numbers, addresses, devices, and coordinated activity. Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) address this limitation by representing customers, accounts, or transactions as graph nodes and learning from both their features and their connections, which turns fraud detection into node classification. This paper reviews the fundamentals, architectures, and limitations of GNN-based fraud detection and critically analyses four recent studies: GraphFA (industrial loan fraud with edge-level camouflage detection), a GCN/GAT/RGCN study on credit-card transactions, FFDM-GNN (IEEE-CIS data), and the proposed real-time Autonomous GNN (AGNN). The strength of evidence differs sharply. GraphFA is supported by a large real dataset, gradient-boosting baselines, and an ablation study, whereas the other studies show probable data leakage after oversampling, conclusions that contradict their own tables, or performance claims without experimental detail. A conceptual framework is outlined that combines leakage-safe data preparation, justified graph construction, camouflage-aware edge filtering, an imbalance-aware relational GNN, strong baselines with honest metrics, and explainability with monitoring. The study is literature-based; the framework has not been implemented or tested

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Advanced Graph Neural Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon